Skip to content
PaperFren

Organic synthesis

A higher-yield route to FP–PEG–biotin ABPP probe

Xu H, Sabit H, Amidon GL, et al. · Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2013

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

Reworking Cravatt’s FP–PEG–biotin synthesis cuts chromatography and raises overall yield from 1% to 28.5%.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.

Inspect source passages

A higher-yield route to FP–PEG–biotin ABPP probe

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

The new route gives 28.5% overall yield of 1 over nine steps.

Starting from common precursor 2 , our synthesis requires only four chromatographic purifications over nine steps and provides a 28.5% overall yield of 1 .

The Cravatt sequence had an overall yield of 1%.

In contrast, the Cravatt sequence requires six chromatographic purifications over eight steps with an overall yield of 1%.
Read passages in the original paper

Key findings

Nine steps, four chromatographies, 28.5% overall yield versus six chromatographies/eight steps and 1% in the original sequence. Key steps: 90% to iodide 4b, 92% Arbuzov, 96% debenzylation, 87% carbonate, 76% biotin coupling, 80% DAST. The probe labels serine hydrolases in proteomes.

Methodology

Authors redesigned the route from tetraethylene glycol via tosylate/iodide, Arbuzov phosphonate, hydrogenolysis, succinimidyl carbonate, biotin coupling, and DAST fluorination, then tested the probe on serine hydrolases and reversible-substrate competition.

Limitations

Competition with reversible substrates is preliminary; this is not a new enzyme-inhibitor campaign with full Ki tables.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.