Computational chemistry
DFT: graphene SACs break CO2 scaling relations
Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC
Single metal atoms in graphene vacancies are predicted to reduce CO2 to methanol or methane at milder limiting potentials than metal terraces by weakening *CO more than *CHO.
How this study connects
Role on claims
Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.
Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.
Discoveries this paper informs or conflicts with
- A single-atom cobalt site, pinned down by imaging and X-ray spectroscopy, then put to work
This paper informs this development.
Inspect source passages
DFT: graphene SACs break CO2 scaling relations
These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.
Metal (211) limiting potentials for CH4 are –0.7 to –0.8 V
For example, the theoretical limiting potentials for CH 4 production on Ni (211), Pt (211) and Cu (211) surfaces are –0.7 to –0.8 V vs.
*CO is destabilized by 0.98 eV versus 0.42 eV for *CHO on Pt@dv-Gr vs Pt(211)
In , it is visually clear that, with the Pt@dv-Gr catalyst, all reaction intermediates are destabilized compared to those on Pt (211), but most importantly, the destabilization of *CO (0.98 eV) is much more noticeable than that of *CHO (0.42 eV), leading to a 0.49 V reduction in the limiting potential.
Key findings
All candidate SACs prefer initial CO2 protonation over HER. Pt@dv-Gr UL = −0.27 V toward CH3OH; Ni@dv-Gr −0.41 V (CH3OH); Os and Ru@dv-Gr −0.52 V (CH4)—versus −0.7 to −0.8 V on Ni/Pt/Cu(211). *CO is destabilized 0.98 eV versus *CHO 0.42 eV on Pt@dv-Gr vs Pt(211). Isolated sites force onefold *CO. Filled d8 Ag/Au/Cu SACs weaken *CHO via antibonding occupation.
Methodology
They ran PBE plane-wave DFT on M@sv-Gr and M@dv-Gr, computed *COOH/*OCHO versus *H, then full pathways to HCOOH, CH3OH, and CH4 with harmonic free-energy and solvation corrections. Binding, Bader charges, and DOS compared Pt@dv-Gr to Pt(211).
Limitations
These are 0 K computational limiting potentials, not measured electrolyzer FEs. Coverage effects are argued to be absent but not proven in situ. PBE plus empirical solvation can mis-order *COOH vs *OCHO. No new catalyst was synthesized in this paper.
Related papers in this topic
Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.