Concept · medicine
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Exposure
4 studiesEvidence last moved Sep 24, 2026
The same dose produces different blood levels and effects in different people, because of genes for drug-metabolising enzymes, body size, sex, co-medications and route of delivery. The evidence here comes from two African efavirenz studies, a Canadian case-control study of gabapentin with opioids, and a small asthma trial of an inhaled drug.
Students often assume dose equals exposure and that interactions come mainly from enzyme-inducing drugs. These studies show genotype can outweigh a famous interaction, that pharmacodynamic combinations can be lethal, and that delivery route can separate benefit from side effects.
Studies
4
Findings
4
4 supporting · 0 challenging · 1 qualifying citations
Open tensions
1
Latest change
Concept page published
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Exposure
Currently
What we know
- Genes can change exposure more than tenfold at the same dose.
- Exposure links genotype to side effects, imperfectly.
- Additive respiratory depression is a real-world, dose-related hazard.
- Local delivery kept systemic exposure, and its side effects, low.
Largest unresolved question
Whether efavirenz levels explain CNS side effects differs between studies: the Ugandan prospective cohort linked higher levels to symptoms, while the Zimbabwean cross-sectional study of patients already on therapy found no difference. Timing matters, as Ugandan symptoms arose mostly in the first two weeks.
Common misconceptions
Rifampicin co-treatment is the main reason efavirenz levels vary in HIV-TB patients.
Rifampicin lowered levels only in week one in Uganda and did not significantly affect clearance in Zimbabwe; CYP2B6 genotype had much larger effects.
Gabapentin is a safe add-on to opioids because it is not an opioid.
Co-prescription carried 49% higher odds of opioid-related death in Ontario, in a dose-related pattern; this is observational but consistent with additive CNS depression.
Related
Claim ledger
What the evidence shows
Drawn from 4 studies in this library. Mix labels say which citation roles are present; they are not a strength score. Supports means evidence for a finding; Challenges means evidence against a stated position; Qualifies marks scope.
Genes can change exposure more than tenfold at the same dose.
CYP2B6 genotype is a major determinant of efavirenz exposure: in 185 Zimbabwean adults, CYP2B6*6, *18, body weight and sex explained up to 55% of between-person variability in clearance, which fell from 7.01 L/h in extensive to 0.539 L/h in poor metabolisers; carriers of two or more variant alleles had about fourfold higher concentrations.
Exposure links genotype to side effects, imperfectly.
Higher efavirenz exposure tracked neuropsychiatric symptoms in a Ugandan cohort of 197 adults: 74% developed a symptom within 12 weeks, symptomatic patients had higher plasma levels, and CYP2B6 genotype predicted levels at every time point, though the direct genotype-symptom link was only a trend.
- Why do people on the same HIV drug dose reach different blood levels?— Cross-sectional Zimbabwean data found no difference in average levels between patients with and without CNS effects.
Study Role Design N Population Outcome Why do some HIV patients get side effects from efavirenz? Supports CohortProspective cohort: treatment-naive HIV patients started efavirenz 600 mg daily (plus zidovudine and lamivudine); TB co-infected patients also took rifampicin-based TB therapy. Mid-dose efavirenz levels were measured from day 3 to week 12, five drug-handling genes were genotyped, and neuropsychiatric symptoms were assessed at baseline, week 2 and week 12. N=197 · 197 patients: 59 with HIV only on efavirenz alone and 138 with HIV-TB co-infection also receiving rifampicin; 89.9% were assessed at week 12. Newly diagnosed, antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV, with or without tuberculosis, at two national referral hospitals in Kampala, Uganda (2008-2009). Incidence and type of neuropsychiatric symptoms (sleep disorders, hallucinations, cognition on an adjusted MMSE) over 12 weeks, and their relation to plasma efavirenz concentration, rifampicin co-treatment and genotype. Why do people on the same HIV drug dose reach different blood levels? QualifiesCross-sectional Zimbabwean data found no difference in average levels between patients with and without CNS effects. Cross-sectionalSingle-timepoint plasma efavirenz measurement (12-15 h post-dose) with TaqMan genotyping, analysed by nonlinear mixed-effects population PK modelling in NONMEM plus Monte Carlo simulations N=185 · 185 patients analysed: 95 recruited on efavirenz-based ART alone and 90 with HIV/TB co-infection also receiving rifampicin-containing TB therapy (60 men, 125 women) Adults with HIV, some co-infected with tuberculosis, attending two hospitals in Zimbabwe while taking efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy Apparent oral clearance of efavirenz and plasma concentration; secondary outcomes were reported central nervous system adverse effects Additive respiratory depression is a real-world, dose-related hazard.
Combining sedating drugs raises risk: in an Ontario nested case-control study, gabapentin co-prescription with opioids was linked to 49% higher odds of opioid-related death (adjusted OR 1.49), rising to 1.83 at very high gabapentin doses, while NSAID co-prescription showed no link.
Local delivery kept systemic exposure, and its side effects, low.
Route of delivery can separate effect from toxicity: in a crossover RCT of 24 adults with mild allergic asthma, inhaled PDE4 inhibitor GSK256066 cut the early allergen response by 40.9% and the late response by 26.2% versus placebo, with blood levels mostly undetectable and none of the nausea typical of oral PDE4 inhibitors.
Debates
Tensions and limits
Some items are genuine disagreements on the same question. Others mark different assays, populations, or outcomes.
Whether efavirenz levels explain CNS side effects differs between studies: the Ugandan prospective cohort linked higher levels to symptoms, while the Zimbabwean cross-sectional study of patients already on therapy found no difference. Timing matters, as Ugandan symptoms arose mostly in the first two weeks.
Qualified studies asking the same question reach different answers. The disagreement is listed, not scored.
Timeline
How understanding moved
Study years are when the paper was published. Evidence edits are dated changes to this page's claims. Explanations are when PaperFren added a Discovery — not a claim that the science happened that day.
2026
Concept page published
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Exposure
Change log
What changed
Dated edits to this page's evidence: studies added or removed from a claim, claims added or withdrawn, and new explanations tagged here. Rewordings are not listed.
- Concept page published
Papers
4 studies in this library bear on Pharmacogenetics and Drug Exposure, ordered by citations.
- Does taking gabapentin with opioids raise overdose death risk?
People on prescription opioids who were also given gabapentin had about 50% higher odds of dying from an opioid overdose, with the greatest risk at moderate-to-high gabapentin doses.
- Why do some HIV patients get side effects from efavirenz?
Most Ugandan patients starting the HIV drug efavirenz had neuropsychiatric side effects such as vivid dreams, and these were linked to higher blood levels of the drug, which in turn depended on a patient's CYP2B6 gene variant, while taking TB drugs at the same time made no difference.
- Does an inhaled PDE4 blocker dampen allergic asthma attacks?
A week of an inhaled PDE4 inhibitor substantially reduced the drop in lung function that people with allergic asthma had after breathing in an allergen, while barely reaching the bloodstream.
- Why do people on the same HIV drug dose reach different blood levels?
Two variants of the liver enzyme gene CYP2B6, along with body weight and sex, together explained about 55% of the person-to-person variation in how quickly patients cleared efavirenz.
Compare studies
Select 2–10 studies. Design and N are labels, not a ranking.
Nothing selected yet.
Questions
What is still open
Whether efavirenz levels explain CNS side effects differs between studies: the Ugandan prospective cohort linked higher levels to symptoms, while the Zimbabwean cross-sectional study of patients already on therapy found no difference. Timing matters, as Ugandan symptoms arose mostly in the first two weeks.
Ask PaperFren about Pharmacogenetics and Drug Exposure
Study this conceptflashcards and short-answer questions
Explain how a single gene variant can change a drug's safety profile, using efavirenz.
CYP2B6 metabolises efavirenz; slow variants such as *6 and *18 cut clearance from about 7 to 0.5 L/h, raising concentrations about fourfold. In Uganda, higher levels accompanied neuropsychiatric symptoms, and nearly all *6 homozygotes had them. Evidence is observational and the genotype-symptom link was a trend, supporting genotype-guided dosing trials.
What does the Ontario gabapentin study show and what design limits apply?
A nested case-control study found 49% higher odds of opioid death with gabapentin co-prescription, with a dose-response. The design matches cases to controls within a population, efficient for rare outcomes, but relies on prescription records and cannot fully exclude confounding by frailty or misuse.