Skip to content
PaperFren

Hard vs soft Ni–Fe catalysts for making hydrogen

Open paper intelligence

A matrix of S-bridged Ni–Fe nitrosyl complexes shows how NO ‘softness’ trades catalytic potential against acid strength and TOF in HER.

Source

A matrix of heterobimetallic complexes for interrogation of hydrogen evolution reaction electrocatalysts

Ghosh P, Ding S, Chupik RB, et al. · Chemical science · 2017

doi.org/10.1039/c7sc03378hRead the full paper ↗39 citationscc by

What they did

Authors prepared NiN2S2·Fe(NO)n bimetallics, solved oxidized/reduced crystal structures, measured CVs and bulk electrolysis with GC headspace H2, and computed protonation/hydride paths.

What they found

All cores are butterfly M(μ-SR)2Fe. Nitrosylated [Ni–Fe]+ and a related complex give faradaic efficiencies of 68±2% and 58±1% (vs ~96% for [Ni–Fe′]+). TOF from CV is 39.7 s−1 vs 26.7 s−1. Soft NO-rich acceptors catalyze at milder potential but need stronger acid and give lower TOF. Computations split heterolytic H−/H+ coupling vs reductive elimination.

The limits

What it doesn't show

These are moderately efficient molecular HER catalysts in organic acid/electrolyte, not device-level water electrolyzers; Tafel behavior in aqueous pH 7 is not established.

Key terms

Hydrogen evolution reaction (HER)
Electrocatalytic 2H+ + 2e− → H2.
Metallodithiolate ligand
MN2S2 unit that binds a second metal through bridging thiolates.
Non-innocent NO
Nitrosyl that stores electrons and shifts redox potential of Fe(NO)2 units.
Faradaic efficiency
Fraction of passed charge that produces H2.
Hemi-labile thiolate
A bridging S that can open a site for proton or hydride binding.

Flashcards

1 / 11

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 6

Shared structural motif of the matrix:

Common questions

What core geometry is conserved?

Butterfly M(μ-SR)2Fe.

What does adding NO ligands buy you?

Milder catalytic potential at the cost of stronger acid and lower TOF.

Which complex is ~96% faradaic?

[Ni–Fe′]+.

Two computed H2-release modes?

Heterolytic hydride–proton coupling vs reductive elimination from two hydrides.

More on Electrochemistry