Electrochemistry
Hard vs soft Ni–Fe catalysts for making hydrogen
Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC
A matrix of S-bridged Ni–Fe nitrosyl complexes shows how NO ‘softness’ trades catalytic potential against acid strength and TOF in HER.
Key findings
All cores are butterfly M(μ-SR)2Fe. Nitrosylated [Ni–Fe]+ and a related complex give faradaic efficiencies of 68±2% and 58±1% (vs ~96% for [Ni–Fe′]+). TOF from CV is 39.7 s−1 vs 26.7 s−1. Soft NO-rich acceptors catalyze at milder potential but need stronger acid and give lower TOF. Computations split heterolytic H−/H+ coupling vs reductive elimination.
Methodology
Authors prepared NiN2S2·Fe(NO)n bimetallics, solved oxidized/reduced crystal structures, measured CVs and bulk electrolysis with GC headspace H2, and computed protonation/hydride paths.
Limitations
These are moderately efficient molecular HER catalysts in organic acid/electrolyte, not device-level water electrolyzers; Tafel behavior in aqueous pH 7 is not established.
How this study connects
Role on claims
Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.
Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.
Related papers in this topic
Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.