Skip to content
PaperFren

Direct SN2 rebound survives bulky alkyl iodides

Open paper intelligence

Even with extra methyl groups on the alkyl iodide, Cl− and CN− still show a direct backward SN2 rebound channel at high collision energy rather than fully statistical dynamics.

Source

Conservation of direct dynamics in sterically hindered S<sub>N</sub>2/E2 reactions

Carrascosa E, Meyer J, Michaelsen T, et al. · Chemical science · 2018

doi.org/10.1039/c7sc04415aRead the full paper ↗34 citationscc by

Study at a glance

Design
Other — Crossed-beam velocity-map imaging of Cl−/CN− with alkyl iodides plus computed SN2/E2 barriers
N
Collision energies 0.4, 1.1, and 1.9 eV across CH3I, CH3CH2I, and (CH3)2CHI
Population
Gas-phase ion–molecule SN2/E2 reactions
Outcome
Direct backward SN2 rebound persists even with steric methylation and outcompetes E2 above 1 eV

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Inspect source passages

Direct SN2 rebound survives bulky alkyl iodides

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

More than half of Cl− + CH3CH2I and CN− + CH3CH2I collisions at 1.9 eV follow direct rebound.

Remarkably, more than half of the reactive collisions follow the direct rebound mechanism for Cl – + CH 3 CH 2 I and CN – + CH 3 CH 2 I at 1.9 eV.

Internal excitation does not exceed 60% of the available energy.

A higher amount of energy is dissipated in form of internal excitation in the reactions Cl – + CH 3 CH 2 I and Cl – + (CH 3 ) 2 CHI, however this fraction does not exceed 60% in any case.
Read passages in the original paper

What they did

The authors crossed mass-selected Cl− or CN− with CH3I, CH3CH2I or (CH3)2CHI beams and recorded I− product velocity-map images at relative collision energies of 0.4, 1.1 and 1.9 eV, comparing angular/energy partitioning with computed SN2 and E2 barriers.

What they found

Direct backward SN2 opens at higher energy as methylation increases, yet at 1.9 eV more than half of Cl−/CN− + CH3CH2I events are direct rebound; energy into product internals stays below 60%. Direct SN2 outcompetes E2 above 1 eV.

The limits

What it doesn't show

These are isolated gas-phase ion–molecule collisions, not condensed-phase SN2 rates or stereochemical inversion yields in solution.

Key terms

Direct rebound SN2
Collinear backside attack that scatters the leaving-group ion backward in the center-of-mass frame.
E2
Bimolecular base-induced elimination competing with substitution on ethyl/isopropyl iodides.
Velocity-map imaging
Ion-imaging method that maps product speed and scattering angle in a single image.
E_rel
Relative collision energy of the ion–molecule pair in the center-of-mass frame.
Walden inversion
Stereochemical inversion associated with backside SN2 attack.

Flashcards

1 / 11

0 of 11 answers reviewed

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 6

The imaged leaving-group product is:

Common questions

Which product ion was imaged?

I− leaving-group ions.

At what E_rel is direct SN2 favoured over E2?

Above 1 eV.

Do methylated systems rebound at 0.4 eV?

No—Cl− and CN− with methylated alkyl iodides show no direct rebound at 0.4 eV.

What fraction of Cl− + CH3CH2I at 1.9 eV is direct rebound?

More than half of the reactive collisions.

More on Reaction mechanisms