Skip to content
PaperFren

Evolved RebH chlorinates indoles at C5, C6 or C7

Open paper intelligence

Mass-spectrometry-guided evolution of RebH produced variants that chlorinate tryptamine ortho, meta or para to the indole nitrogen without a synthetic directing group.

Source

Directed Evolution of RebH for Catalyst-Controlled Halogenation of Indole C-H Bonds

Andorfer MC, Park HJ, Vergara-Coll J, et al. · Chemical science · 2016

doi.org/10.1039/c5sc04680gRead the full paper ↗77 citationscc by

Inspect source passages

Evolved RebH chlorinates indoles at C5, C6 or C7

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

Variant 0S gave 2.5-fold higher chlorination yield than RebH with >99% 7-selectivity.

Introducing this mutation into RebH gave variant 0S, which provided the highest chlorination yields of all variants evaluated (2.5-fold higher than RebH, >99% 7-chlorination, ).

8F showed 85% 6-selectivity and an 11-fold yield increase over 7M.

Remarkably, the variant with the highest selectivity for 6-chlorination (85%) as well as the highest yield of 6-chlorotryptamine (11-fold increase over 7M) from this library, 8F (7M-L111F), resulted from reversion of the F111L mutation that originally led to a significant change in 7-selectivity of 3W.
Read passages in the original paper

What they did

Authors screened error-prone and site-saturation libraries of RebH on deuterium-labeled tryptamines by MALDI/LC-MS, then characterised variants 0S, 8F and 10S for 7-, 6- and 5-chlorination including docking versus native tryptophan binding.

What they found

0S (N470S) raised 7-chlorination yield 2.5-fold at >99% selectivity. 8F reached 85% 6-selectivity and 11-fold more 6-chlorotryptamine than 7M. 8F/10S still select C6/C5 despite weak binding, not the innately reactive C2.

The limits

What it doesn't show

Docking poses are models; crystal structures of the evolved variants with tryptamine were not solved, so how mutations retune binding remains unproven.

Key terms

RebH
Flavin-dependent tryptophan 7-halogenase used as the evolution parent.
Catalyst-controlled C–H halogenation
Site selectivity set by the enzyme, not by a substrate directing group.
8F / 10S
Evolved variants selective for 6- and 5-chlorotryptamine, respectively.
MALDI-MS screen
High-throughput mass assay using deuterated probes to score isomer ratios.
HalA
Computed C–H chlorination barrier used to rank innate site reactivity.

Flashcards

1 / 11

0 of 11 answers reviewed

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 7

Native RebH prefers chlorination at:

Common questions

What native RebH site is preferred?

The 7-position of the indole.

What selectivities did 8F and 10S achieve?

Almost exclusive 6- and 5-chlorination, respectively.

Did they need a directing group on the substrate?

No—selectivity is catalyst-controlled.

How was 5 vs 6 distinguished?

Deuterium-substituted probes plus MS.

More on Catalysis