Skip to content
PaperFren

Catalysis

Evolved RebH chlorinates indoles at C5, C6 or C7

Andorfer MC, Park HJ, Vergara-Coll J, et al. · Chemical science · 2016

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

Mass-spectrometry-guided evolution of RebH produced variants that chlorinate tryptamine ortho, meta or para to the indole nitrogen without a synthetic directing group.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.

Inspect source passages

Evolved RebH chlorinates indoles at C5, C6 or C7

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

Variant 0S gave 2.5-fold higher chlorination yield than RebH with >99% 7-selectivity.

Introducing this mutation into RebH gave variant 0S, which provided the highest chlorination yields of all variants evaluated (2.5-fold higher than RebH, >99% 7-chlorination, ).

8F showed 85% 6-selectivity and an 11-fold yield increase over 7M.

Remarkably, the variant with the highest selectivity for 6-chlorination (85%) as well as the highest yield of 6-chlorotryptamine (11-fold increase over 7M) from this library, 8F (7M-L111F), resulted from reversion of the F111L mutation that originally led to a significant change in 7-selectivity of 3W.
Read passages in the original paper

Key findings

0S (N470S) raised 7-chlorination yield 2.5-fold at >99% selectivity. 8F reached 85% 6-selectivity and 11-fold more 6-chlorotryptamine than 7M. 8F/10S still select C6/C5 despite weak binding, not the innately reactive C2.

Methodology

Authors screened error-prone and site-saturation libraries of RebH on deuterium-labeled tryptamines by MALDI/LC-MS, then characterised variants 0S, 8F and 10S for 7-, 6- and 5-chlorination including docking versus native tryptophan binding.

Limitations

Docking poses are models; crystal structures of the evolved variants with tryptamine were not solved, so how mutations retune binding remains unproven.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.