Skip to content
PaperFren

Does mixed DNA inside a head-and-neck tumor predict death?

Open paper intelligence

In 305 TCGA HNSCC patients, high intra-tumor MATH heterogeneity more than doubled the hazard of death (HR 2.2; 95% CI 1.4–3.3), even after HPV, TP53, grade, and N classification.

Source

Intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity and mortality in head and neck cancer: analysis of data from the Cancer Genome Atlas

Mroz EA, Tward AD, Hammon RJ, et al. · PLoS medicine · 2015

doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001786Read the full paper ↗227 citationscc by

Study at a glance

Design
Cohort — Retrospective TCGA analysis of bulk-tumor WES MATH vs overall survival in HNSCC (diagnoses 1992–2011).
N
N=305 · 305 HNSCC patients from 14 institutions; 131 deaths (median time to death 14 months); living median follow-up 22 months.
Population
TCGA head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cases with clinical and whole-exome data (October 2013 freeze).
Outcome
Overall survival associated with high vs low mutant-allele tumor heterogeneity (MATH).

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Inspect source passages

Does mixed DNA inside a head-and-neck tumor predict death?

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

305 HNSCC patients from 14 institutions were analyzed.

Clinical and WES data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas in October 2013 for 305 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), from 14 institutions.

High vs low MATH HR for death was 2.2 (95% CI 1.4–3.3).

hazard ratio for high/low heterogeneity, 2.2; 95% CI 1.4 to 3.3
Read passages in the original paper

What they did

Calculated MATH from bulk-tumor whole-exome sequencing for 305 HNSCC cases from 14 institutions and related high vs low MATH to overall survival with Cox models, including multivariate adjustment for standard clinical/molecular factors.

What they found

High MATH HR was 2.2 (univariate ~2.18). The association was not explained by age, HPV, grade, TP53, or N class, improved prognostication, and still split oral-cavity and laryngeal outcomes after staging. Chemoradiotherapy patients showed a particularly large HR (5.2).

The limits

What it doesn't show

Retrospective multi-site TCGA data were not collected to study MATH; prospective, homogeneously treated series (especially HPV+ oropharynx) are still required before clinical use.

Key terms

MATH
Mutant-allele tumor heterogeneity: a WES-based summary of how spread-out mutant allele fractions are in bulk tumor DNA.
HNSCC
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; 305 TCGA cases here.
Intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity
Mixture of genetically distinct tumor cells; MATH is a bulk-DNA proxy.
TCGA
The Cancer Genome Atlas; source of the WES and clinical files (Oct 2013).
HPV-positive HNSCC
Usually better prognosis; MATH added information beyond HPV status, but HPV+ oropharynx still needs dedicated study.

Flashcards

1 / 10

0 of 10 answers reviewed

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 6

TCGA HNSCC n was:

Common questions

How many patients?

305 HNSCC cases from 14 institutions.

High vs low MATH survival HR?

About 2.2 (95% CI 1.4–3.3).

Was it just HPV or TP53 in disguise?

No—the MATH–mortality link persisted after those and other standard factors.

Ready for clinic?

Not yet—authors require prospective, site-specific, homogeneously treated studies.

More on Oncology outcomes