Skip to content
PaperFren

Microbiome

Infant diet shapes gut–host immunity

Schwartz S, Friedberg I, Ivanov IV, et al. · Genome biology · 2012

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

Breast- vs formula-fed infants differ in gut microbiota and host immune gene expression.

Study at a glance

Design
Cross-sectional — Infant stool metagenomes correlated with host epithelial transcriptomes by feeding mode
N
N=12 · Six breast-fed and six formula-fed infants
Population
Breast-fed and formula-fed human infants
Outcome
Diet-linked microbiota composition and host intestinal/immunity gene expression

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Key findings

Diet altered Firmicutes/Actinobacteria composition; 459 intestinal and 660 immunity genes were tested, with many differentially expressed between diets.

Methodology

Sequenced stool metagenomes and profiled host epithelial mRNA from 6 breast-fed and 6 formula-fed infants, then correlated taxa/genes with host transcripts.

Limitations

Small n; association does not prove which microbes cause each transcript change.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

  • 16S-style community profiles are sometimes paired with metabolites or, in infants, with shotgun metagenomes and host transcripts. A METSIM subset linked gut microbes to plasma metabolites and metabolic traits in Finnish men; six breast-fed versus six formula-fed infants showed diet-altered Firmicutes/Actinobacteria and many differentially expressed host immunity genes.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • Marker-gene 16S and shotgun metagenomes answer different questions in this set. HMP biogeography and the bee pesticide paper are amplicon community maps (the bee paper adds ITS); the infant diet paper sequences stool metagenomes and host mRNA. Treating every 'microbiome sequencing' paper as 16S genus tables hides the extra functional genes the infant paper actually uses.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • Stool metagenomes plus epithelial mRNA from 6 breast-fed and 6 formula-fed infants showed diet-altered Firmicutes/Actinobacteria composition. The study tested 459 intestinal and 660 immunity genes, with many differentially expressed between diets. Small n and correlation do not prove which microbes cause each transcript change.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • Shotgun gene-content metagenomics (within-species deletions across people; infant diet genes plus 459/660 host transcripts; B. dorei before seroconversion) is not the same experiment as HMP-style 16S biogeography (>24 million reads, 2,983 specimens, ~8,167 V3–V5 reads). A 16S habitat map cannot report accessory genes; a gene-deletion call cannot replace body-wide taxonomy.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • Even among shotgun studies, claims differ in strength. Infant diet work is n=6 versus 6 with host-transcript correlations; DIPP is 76 children and 947 samples but still does not prove B. dorei causes autoimmunity; within-species gene content varies without assigning a disease. Pooling them as 'the microbiome causes immunity' overreads every design.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

Open questions

Tensions this paper is part of

From concept pages' “where studies disagree.” Disagreement means the same question; scope means different assays, populations, or outcomes.

  • Scope difference — different assays, populations, or outcomes

    Marker-gene 16S and shotgun metagenomes answer different questions in this set. HMP biogeography and the bee pesticide paper are amplicon community maps (the bee paper adds ITS); the infant diet paper sequences stool metagenomes and host mRNA. Treating every 'microbiome sequencing' paper as 16S genus tables hides the extra functional genes the infant paper actually uses.

  • Scope difference — different assays, populations, or outcomes

    Shotgun gene-content metagenomics (within-species deletions across people; infant diet genes plus 459/660 host transcripts; B. dorei before seroconversion) is not the same experiment as HMP-style 16S biogeography (>24 million reads, 2,983 specimens, ~8,167 V3–V5 reads). A 16S habitat map cannot report accessory genes; a gene-deletion call cannot replace body-wide taxonomy.

  • Scope difference — different assays, populations, or outcomes

    Even among shotgun studies, claims differ in strength. Infant diet work is n=6 versus 6 with host-transcript correlations; DIPP is 76 children and 947 samples but still does not prove B. dorei causes autoimmunity; within-species gene content varies without assigning a disease. Pooling them as 'the microbiome causes immunity' overreads every design.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.