Microbiome
How did some Enterococcus faecium become hospital pathogens?
Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC
Comparative pangenomes split E. faecium into a mixed-source subclade I and a human-only subclade II with larger genomes packed with resistance, virulence, bacteriocin, and mobile genes likely gained by HGT.
Study at a glance
- Design
- Computational / modelling — Comparative pangenome analysis of dereplicated E. faecium and E. lactis genomes
- N
- All available dereplicated genomes of the two species (counts in full text tables)
- Population
- Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus lactis genomes from diverse isolation sources
- Outcome
- Subclade structure and enrichment of resistance/virulence/mobile genes
Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.
Key findings
Subclade II was exclusively human-derived, larger, and richer in resistance/virulence/mobile elements; phylogenetic patterns support horizontal acquisition tied to antibiotic pressure. E. lactis did not cluster by isolation source.
Methodology
They analyzed all available dereplicated genomes of E. faecium and closely related E. lactis, comparing phylogeny, genome size/gene content, and resistance/virulence gene histories.
Limitations
Genome catalogs do not measure in-host virulence experimentally or prove causality for every gene’s clinical effect.
How this study connects
Role on claims
Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.
Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.
Related papers in this topic
Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.