Concept · physics
Superconductivity
9 studies1 discoveryEvidence last moved Sep 27, 2026
Superconductivity is a state in which paired electrons carry current with zero resistance below a critical temperature and field. The papers here cover how Tc and critical fields change with thinning, strain and pressure, signs of unconventional pairing, induced superconductivity in topological materials, and how the superconducting order recovers after a light pulse.
Students learn BCS theory as the rule, but several of these studies probe where it holds (thin aluminium) and where claims of unconventional behaviour rest on indirect evidence. Knowing the difference between measuring zero resistance and proving a pairing mechanism clears up much of the hype around new superconductors.
Studies
9
Findings
6
10 supporting · 0 challenging · 3 qualifying citations
Open tensions
2
Latest change
Concept page published
Superconductivity
Currently
What we know
- Structure at the nanometre scale can change Tc a lot.
- Some enhancements stay BCS-like; others reflect genuinely strong coupling.
- Broken symmetry and thinness produce behaviour ordinary superconductors lack.
- Unconventional pairing is inferred from signatures, not seen directly.
- Hybrid devices can carry pair correlations into topological films.
Largest unresolved question
Topological or not? Both hybrid-device studies see signatures compatible with topological superconductivity, but simulations in the QAH study show trivial pairing produces the same crossed Andreev signal, and the nano-SQUID link to Majorana modes is theoretical; neither detects Majoranas.
Common misconceptions
Zero resistance plus an odd feature proves unconventional or topological superconductivity.
The QAH hybrid study showed a trivial pairing model can reproduce its key signal, the nano-SQUID study did not detect Majoranas, and the pairing state in NbRuSi/TaRuSi could not be distinguished between models.
A higher Tc always means a departure from BCS theory.
Aluminium's Tc nearly tripled in ultrathin films while its gap-to-Tc ratio stayed near the BCS value of 3.53.
A film that shows superconductivity is superconducting throughout.
In strained La2CuO4 nanocomposites only about 5% of the volume had the enhanced Tc, confined to about 10 nm near interfaces.
Related
Claim ledger
What the evidence shows
Drawn from 9 studies in this library. Mix labels say which citation roles are present; they are not a strength score. Supports means evidence for a finding; Challenges means evidence against a stated position; Qualifies marks scope.
Structure at the nanometre scale can change Tc a lot.
Thinning or straining a material can raise Tc sharply: aluminium films near four atomic layers reached Tc = 3.31 K versus 1.2 K in bulk, with a gap more than three times bulk, and strained regions near nanocomposite walls in La2CuO4 films gave an onset near 50 K versus about 35 K for conventional films.
- Can stretching a cuprate vertically raise its superconducting temperature?— Only about 5% of the film volume superconducts at the higher Tc; thick films did not reliably show it.
- Does aluminum superconduct better when only a few atoms thick?— Tc measured on only four films; mechanism unexplained.
Study Role Design N Population Outcome Does aluminum superconduct better when only a few atoms thick? Supports OtherLab experiment: Al(111) films of different thicknesses grown in ultrahigh vacuum on Si(111) and probed in situ by scanning tunneling spectroscopy down to millikelvin temperatures, with magnetic fields and Usadel-equation simulations. Many separately grown films; each data point in the gap-versus-coverage plot is one sample. Critical temperature was measured on only four films. Epitaxial aluminum films roughly 4 to 35 monolayers thick on Si(111)-(7x7) Superconducting gap and critical temperature versus film thickness; response to perpendicular and in-plane magnetic fields (vortices, spin-split gap, g-factor) Can stretching a cuprate vertically raise its superconducting temperature? Supports OtherPulsed-laser-deposited vertically aligned nanocomposite films on SrTiO3, characterised by resistance and magnetisation versus temperature, XPS, low-temperature STM/STS and atomic-resolution STEM lattice mapping. No participant sample; more than 10 films were grown, and the reported analysis focuses on five ~25 nm films (S1 to S5), with different films used for different measurements. Thin films of La2CuO4+δ (214) nanostructures embedded in a LaCuO3 (113) matrix on (001) SrTiO3 substrates Superconducting transition temperature, superconducting volume fraction, tunnelling gap, and local lattice parameters c and a near the 214/113 interfaces Some enhancements stay BCS-like; others reflect genuinely strong coupling.
Enhanced Tc does not automatically mean exotic pairing: in thin aluminium the gap-to-Tc ratio stayed near the BCS value of 3.53, whereas bismuth's high-pressure Bi-III phase showed strong coupling (inferred λ about 2.75) and the highest upper critical field of any element, about 2.45 T.
- Does aluminum superconduct better when only a few atoms thick?
- Why does squeezed bismuth superconduct so strongly?
Study Role Design N Population Outcome Does aluminum superconduct better when only a few atoms thick? Supports OtherLab experiment: Al(111) films of different thicknesses grown in ultrahigh vacuum on Si(111) and probed in situ by scanning tunneling spectroscopy down to millikelvin temperatures, with magnetic fields and Usadel-equation simulations. Many separately grown films; each data point in the gap-versus-coverage plot is one sample. Critical temperature was measured on only four films. Epitaxial aluminum films roughly 4 to 35 monolayers thick on Si(111)-(7x7) Superconducting gap and critical temperature versus film thickness; response to perpendicular and in-plane magnetic fields (vortices, spin-split gap, g-factor) Why does squeezed bismuth superconduct so strongly? Supports OtherLab measurements of resistivity and magnetization of bismuth under pressure, combined with ab initio electronic-structure and phonon calculations. No participant count; samples cut from a single commercial bismuth crystal measured in pressure cells. Elemental bismuth in its high-pressure incommensurate host-guest phase (Bi-III) Superconducting transition temperature, upper and lower critical fields, normal-state resistivity slope, and inferred electron-phonon coupling constant Broken symmetry and thinness produce behaviour ordinary superconductors lack.
Two-dimensional superconductors can exceed the usual Pauli paramagnetic limit for in-plane fields: printed 1T'-WS2 monolayer films had an extrapolated in-plane critical field of about 30 T against a 13.1 T Pauli limit, and twisted MoTe2 junctions showed critical currents with a V-shaped minimum at zero field that vanished in untwisted controls.
- Can a water-based ink of 2D sheets superconduct?— In-plane field is extrapolated from a fit beyond the 9 T measured.
Study Role Design N Population Outcome Can a water-based ink of 2D sheets superconduct? Supports OtherChemical exfoliation of K0.5WS2 into 1T'-WS2 monolayer ink, structural characterization (AFM, TEM, EELS, XRD, Raman, XPS), then low-temperature transport and magnetization on drop-cast films. No single N; over 200 nanosheets sized by AFM, over 50 checked by local diffraction/STEM, two printed transport devices. Films and pellets of chemically exfoliated 1T'-WS2 monolayer nanosheets Superconducting transition temperature, in-plane and out-of-plane upper critical fields, critical current, and stability after air exposure Does a twisted MoTe2 bilayer superconduct in an unusual way? Supports OtherLow-temperature transport and electron-microscopy experiment on Pd7MoTe2/twisted-MoTe2/Pd7MoTe2 junctions, with a natural-bilayer junction as a control A handful of devices: twisted-bilayer transport devices D2 and D3, natural-bilayer device D4, a monolayer comparison device, and separate TEM samples Twisted (about 3.7°) and natural bilayer MoTe2 junctions about 100 nm long between superconducting Pd7MoTe2 pads Resistance versus temperature, critical current versus magnetic field, critical field, and normal-state resistance Unconventional pairing is inferred from signatures, not seen directly.
Evidence for time-reversal-symmetry breaking or mixed pairing comes from indirect probes: muon-spin relaxation in NbRuSi and TaRuSi polycrystals detected tiny spontaneous fields below Tc and a fully gapped superfluid density consistent with s + ip pairing.
Hybrid devices can carry pair correlations into topological films.
Superconductivity can be induced into topological materials: niobium fingers on a quantum anomalous Hall film produced crossed Andreev reflection with a decay length of about 100 nm, and a Nb-contacted BiSbTeSe2 nanowire showed a gate- and field-tunable superconducting diode effect with efficiency up to about 0.3.
- Can a superconductor induce pairing in a magnetic topological edge?
- Can a tiny topological wire act as a switchable superconducting diode?
Study Role Design N Population Outcome Can a superconductor induce pairing in a magnetic topological edge? Supports OtherLow-temperature three-terminal transport on V-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3 Hall bars with Nb finger electrodes of different widths, plus tight-binding transport simulations Several devices (A to F) with Nb finger widths from 160 to 520 nm; no single sample count Thin-film quantum anomalous Hall insulator devices contacted by superconducting niobium fingers Downstream (nonlocal) resistance versus magnetic field, temperature and finger width Can a tiny topological wire act as a switchable superconducting diode? Supports OtherLow-temperature transport on Nb-contacted BiSbTeSe2 nanowire junctions versus parallel field and gate voltage, with tight-binding simulations and a phenomenological SQUID model No sample N; main data from device A, rectification from device B, and three further devices in supplementary material Bulk-insulating BiSbTeSe2 topological-insulator nanowires side-contacted by niobium electrodes, measured near 30 mK Critical currents in each direction and diode efficiency versus parallel magnetic field and back-gate voltage An 'anomalous metal' can be a superconductor with moving vortices.
Disorder and vortices control low-temperature resistance in atom-thin films: in monolayer Pb on Si, resistance saturated at a finite value between about 25 and 100 mT, the same range in which STM imaged stable vortex lattices, and added step disorder lowered Tc from 1.53 K to 1.21 K.
Debates
Tensions and limits
Some items are genuine disagreements on the same question. Others mark different assays, populations, or outcomes.
Topological or not? Both hybrid-device studies see signatures compatible with topological superconductivity, but simulations in the QAH study show trivial pairing produces the same crossed Andreev signal, and the nano-SQUID link to Majorana modes is theoretical; neither detects Majoranas.
Topological or not? Both hybrid-device studies see signatures compatible with topological superconductivity, but simulations in the QAH study show trivial pairing produces the same crossed Andreev signal, and the nano-SQUID link to Majorana modes is theoretical; neither detects Majoranas.
- Can a superconductor induce pairing in a magnetic topological edge?
- Can a tiny topological wire act as a switchable superconducting diode?
Study Role Design N Population Outcome Can a superconductor induce pairing in a magnetic topological edge? Supports OtherLow-temperature three-terminal transport on V-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3 Hall bars with Nb finger electrodes of different widths, plus tight-binding transport simulations Several devices (A to F) with Nb finger widths from 160 to 520 nm; no single sample count Thin-film quantum anomalous Hall insulator devices contacted by superconducting niobium fingers Downstream (nonlocal) resistance versus magnetic field, temperature and finger width Can a tiny topological wire act as a switchable superconducting diode? Supports OtherLow-temperature transport on Nb-contacted BiSbTeSe2 nanowire junctions versus parallel field and gate voltage, with tight-binding simulations and a phenomenological SQUID model No sample N; main data from device A, rectification from device B, and three further devices in supplementary material Bulk-insulating BiSbTeSe2 topological-insulator nanowires side-contacted by niobium electrodes, measured near 30 mK Critical currents in each direction and diode efficiency versus parallel magnetic field and back-gate voltage
PaperFren reads this as a limit on how far one study travels — different assays, populations, or outcomes — not a forced fight between papers.
Thin-film enhancement looks different in different systems: aluminium's Tc rose on thinning, but monolayer Pb's Tc fell when step disorder was added, so 'thinner is better' depends on disorder and material.
Thin-film enhancement looks different in different systems: aluminium's Tc rose on thinning, but monolayer Pb's Tc fell when step disorder was added, so 'thinner is better' depends on disorder and material.
- Does aluminum superconduct better when only a few atoms thick?
- Why does a 2D superconductor keep a little resistance near zero kelvin?
Study Role Design N Population Outcome Does aluminum superconduct better when only a few atoms thick? Supports OtherLab experiment: Al(111) films of different thicknesses grown in ultrahigh vacuum on Si(111) and probed in situ by scanning tunneling spectroscopy down to millikelvin temperatures, with magnetic fields and Usadel-equation simulations. Many separately grown films; each data point in the gap-versus-coverage plot is one sample. Critical temperature was measured on only four films. Epitaxial aluminum films roughly 4 to 35 monolayers thick on Si(111)-(7x7) Superconducting gap and critical temperature versus film thickness; response to perpendicular and in-plane magnetic fields (vortices, spin-split gap, g-factor) Why does a 2D superconductor keep a little resistance near zero kelvin? Supports OtherLab experiment: four-probe transport and 0.36 K scanning tunnelling spectroscopy under perpendicular magnetic field on monolayer Pb on flat and vicinal (0.5°, 1.1°) Si(111), with step density as tunable disorder. No sample count; flat, 0.5°- and 1.1°-tilted samples measured. Striped incommensurate monolayer Pb on flat and vicinal Si(111) substrates Sheet resistance versus temperature and field; zero-bias conductance maps showing vortices; superconducting gap evolution
PaperFren reads this as a limit on how far one study travels — different assays, populations, or outcomes — not a forced fight between papers.
Timeline
How understanding moved
Study years are when the paper was published. Evidence edits are dated changes to this page's claims. Explanations are when PaperFren added a Discovery — not a claim that the science happened that day.
2026
- Why does a 2D superconductor keep a little resistance near zero kelvin?
- Aluminum a few atoms thick superconducts at about three times its bulk temperature
Concept page published
Superconductivity
Change log
What changed
Dated edits to this page's evidence: studies added or removed from a claim, claims added or withdrawn, and new explanations tagged here. Rewordings are not listed.
- Concept page published
- Aluminum a few atoms thick superconducts at about three times its bulk temperatureEvidence: Preliminary
Papers
9 studies in this library bear on Superconductivity, ordered by citations.
- Can a water-based ink of 2D sheets superconduct?
A water-based ink of single-layer tungsten disulfide sheets can be printed into films that superconduct below about 7 kelvin, resist in-plane magnetic fields unusually well, and survive a month in air.
- Can stretching a cuprate vertically raise its superconducting temperature?
Embedding a cuprate superconductor inside a stiffer partner material stretched its crystal layers vertically near their shared walls and raised the superconducting transition to about 50 K, above what ordinary films of this compound reach.
- Does aluminum superconduct better when only a few atoms thick?
Ultrathin, clean aluminum films superconduct at roughly three times the temperature of bulk aluminum, and the enhancement grows steadily as the film gets thinner.
- Why does squeezed bismuth superconduct so strongly?
When pressure turns bismuth into a structure with mismatched, interpenetrating atomic chains, it becomes an unusually strong superconductor, likely because the chains can slide and create very soft vibrations.
- Does a twisted MoTe2 bilayer superconduct in an unusual way?
Short junctions of twisted bilayer MoTe2 carried supercurrent that survived higher fields and temperatures than the superconducting contacts and was weakest at zero magnetic field, unlike an untwisted control.
- Do topological semimetals NbRuSi and TaRuSi superconduct unusually?
Ruthenium silicides NbRuSi and TaRuSi, which are topological semimetals, become superconductors that spontaneously generate tiny internal magnetic fields, a hallmark of unconventional pairing.
- Can a superconductor induce pairing in a magnetic topological edge?
A narrow superconducting strip on the edge of a quantum anomalous Hall insulator turns incoming electrons into outgoing holes, showing superconducting correlations have leaked into the edge state.
- Can a tiny topological wire act as a switchable superconducting diode?
A topological-insulator nanowire between two superconductors carries more supercurrent one way than the other, and both the size and direction of this diode effect can be flipped with a magnetic field or a gate voltage.
Show 1 more studiesShow fewer studies
- Why does a 2D superconductor keep a little resistance near zero kelvin?
In atom-thin lead superconductors, the leftover resistance of the 'anomalous metal' state appears while vortices sit still under the microscope, suggesting the measuring current, not quantum fluctuations, moves them.
Compare studies
Select 2–10 studies. Design and N are labels, not a ranking.
Nothing selected yet.
Questions
What is still open
Topological or not? Both hybrid-device studies see signatures compatible with topological superconductivity, but simulations in the QAH study show trivial pairing produces the same crossed Andreev signal, and the nano-SQUID link to Majorana modes is theoretical; neither detects Majoranas.
Thin-film enhancement looks different in different systems: aluminium's Tc rose on thinning, but monolayer Pb's Tc fell when step disorder was added, so 'thinner is better' depends on disorder and material.
Ask PaperFren about Superconductivity
Study this conceptflashcards and short-answer questions
How could you tell whether a Tc enhancement in a thin film reflects stronger electron coupling?
Compare the gap to Tc. In ultrathin aluminium, both the gap and Tc rose by about three times but their ratio stayed close to the BCS weak-coupling value of 3.53, so coupling strength did not change much. In contrast, bismuth's Bi-III phase had an inferred electron-phonon coupling of about 2.75, marking strong coupling. A ratio or coupling estimate, not Tc alone, tells you about the regime.
Why is a negative nonlocal resistance in a superconductor/quantum anomalous Hall device not proof of Majorana modes?
The negative resistance signals crossed Andreev reflection, meaning pair correlations were induced in the film under a narrow niobium finger, with a decay length around 100 nm. But the authors' own simulations showed that both trivial and topological superconductivity produce this signal. The signal was also only about 3% of the ideal maximum. Proving Majoranas needs a measurement that only topological pairing can produce.