Skip to content
PaperFren

Why stronger stratification is changing ocean tides

Open paper intelligence

Model and satellite M2 trends since 1993 point to stronger ocean stratification increasing tidal conversion, not just sea-level rise.

Source

A likely role for stratification in long-term changes of the global ocean tides

Opel L, Schindelegger M, Ray RD · Communications earth & environment · 2024

doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01432-5Read the full paper ↗1 citationscc by

Study at a glance

Design
Computational / modelling — Yearly internal-tide-permitting MITgcm runs relaxed to reanalysis stratification, compared with altimetry and tide gauges
N
1993–2020 simulations; coastal M2 trends matched about half of 10 tide-gauge cases
Population
Global ocean M2 tide, 1993–2020
Outcome
Strengthening stratification, not sea-level rise, accounts for much of the observed long-term M2 change

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Inspect source passages

Why stronger stratification is changing ocean tides

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

Simulations typically capture 60% of the satellite M2 trend estimate.

Our simulations typically capture 60% of the satellite estimate, pointing to a residual that may arise from model limitations, subtle errors in the altimetry solution, or both (Methods).

Over what period are stratification-forced tide trends diagnosed?

Emphasis is on trends from 1993 to 2020, a period where we have suitable three-dimensional (3D) density data.
Read passages in the original paper

What they did

Authors ran yearly internal-tide-permitting MITgcm simulations relaxed to reanalysis stratification for 1993–2020 and compared M2 trends with altimetry, tide gauges, and a 2-D sea-level-rise tide model.

What they found

Stratification-driven coastal M2 trends are about 0.1 mm/yr and match roughly half of ten tide-gauge cases. Open-ocean M2 is mostly declining; the 3-D runs capture about 60% of satellite regional trends, while relative sea-level rise explains ≲20% at most open-coast sites.

The limits

What it doesn't show

German Bight decline is not explained by these runs; Northwest European Shelf results are sensitive to steric corrections, and altimetry still has uncorrected systematic errors.

Key terms

M2 tide
Principal lunar semidiurnal tidal constituent.
Tidal conversion
Transfer of barotropic tidal energy into internal tides at topography.
Stratification
Vertical density structure that supports internal waves.
Barotropic tide
Depth-averaged tidal motion, as opposed to internal (baroclinic) tides.
MITgcm
Ocean general circulation model used here in tide-permitting mode.

Flashcards

1 / 11

0 of 11 answers reviewed

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 7

Primary driver of 1993–2020 open-ocean M2 trends here:

Common questions

What years are modeled?

1993–2020, when 3-D density data exist.

Does sea-level rise explain most M2 trends?

No—typically ≲20% at open-coast sites.

Main proposed mechanism?

Enhanced tidal conversion over steep topography as stratification strengthens.

How much of satellite M2 decline is captured?

About 60% in four regional averages.

More on Ocean circulation