Skip to content
PaperFren

Do social and non-social attention combine to predict autism?

Infants who show both reduced social attention and slower attention disengagement are at the highest risk for developing autism, with these factors combining additively rather than interactively.

Source

Additive effects of social and non-social attention during infancy relate to later autism spectrum disorder

Bedford R, Pickles A, Gliga T, et al. · Developmental science · 2014

doi.org/10.1111/desc.12139Read the full paper ↗49 citationscc by

What they did

The researchers measured both social attention (using an eye-tracking gaze-following task) and non-social attention (using a gap-overlap task) in low-risk and high-risk infants at 13 months. At 36 months, these children were assessed clinically for an autism diagnosis. The authors then used statistical modeling to determine whether these two attentional measures predicted later autism outcomes independently or through interaction.

What they found

Both reduced social looking time and slower visual disengagement at 13 months independently predicted an autism diagnosis at 36 months. An additive model of risk fit the data significantly better than a multiplicative model, with log-likelihoods of −14.18 and −19.77 respectively. This indicates that social and non-social attention deficits represent distinct, cumulative pathways to autism rather than a single interacting cascade.

The limits

What it doesn't show

The study is limited by a relatively small clinical sample, with only 17 infants in the high-risk group receiving an autism diagnosis, which restricts generalizability. Since the data are observational and correlational, the design cannot prove that these attentional differences directly cause autism. Additionally, the study did not examine whether these early attention measures map onto specific subtypes of later autism symptoms, such as restricted or repetitive behaviors.

Key terms

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
A neurodevelopmental condition characterized by difficulties in social communication and interaction, alongside restricted and repetitive behaviors.
Joint Attention (JA)
The shared focus of two individuals on an object or event, achieved through eye-gaze, pointing, or other verbal/non-verbal cues.
Gap-overlap task
A cognitive test measuring how quickly an individual can disengage their visual attention from a central stimulus to look at a newly appearing peripheral target.
Saccadic reaction time
The latency or speed with which an individual makes a rapid eye movement (saccade) to shift their gaze to a new target.
Cumulative risk model
A developmental framework proposing that multiple independent risk factors add together to increase the likelihood of a clinical outcome.
Cascading risk model
A developmental framework proposing that early risk factors interact with one another over time, leading to non-linear and compounding developmental outcomes.

Flashcards

1 / 30

Want these cards to stick?

Save the deck to NoteFren and study it with spaced repetition.

Save these cards to NoteFren— study “Do social and non-social attention combine to predict autism?” with spaced repetition

Quiz yourself

1 / 10

What is the primary aim of this study regarding the development of autism spectrum disorder (ASD)?

Common questions

Why did the researchers study infants who have older siblings with autism?

Infants with older siblings diagnosed with autism are at a higher genetic risk (around 20%) of developing autism themselves, making them an ideal group to study prospectively to find early behavioral markers before symptoms fully emerge.

What is the difference between an additive and a multiplicative risk model?

An additive model suggests that two risk factors act independently, meaning their combined effect is simply the sum of their individual risks. A multiplicative model suggests that the risk factors interact or work on a common pathway, meaning having both risks multiplies the likelihood of the outcome far beyond their simple sum.

Why did the study look at both social and non-social attention?

Traditional theories often try to explain autism using a single core deficit (either social, like gaze-following, or non-social, like visual disengagement). Studying both allowed researchers to test if autism arises from multiple, co-occurring attentional difficulties.

Did all infants with autism show difficulties in both types of attention?

No, some infants who were later diagnosed with autism had difficulties only in social looking time, while others struggled only with non-social disengagement. However, those who struggled with both had the highest probability of receiving a diagnosis.

More on Autism