Skip to content
PaperFren

How does the ability to stop automatic habits develop in kids?

Children's ability to suppress automatic responses improves rapidly as they grow, with performance on a low-memory inhibitory task leveling off in early childhood for accuracy and in later childhood for speed.

Source

Age-related trends of inhibitory control in Stroop-like big-small task in 3 to 12-year-old children and young adults

Ikeda Y, Okuzumi H, Kokubun M · Frontiers in psychology · 2014

doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00227Read the full paper ↗13 citationscc by

What they did

Researchers tested 113 typically developing people divided into six age groups, ranging from young children to young adults. Participants completed a 'same' condition and an 'opposite' condition, with each condition consisting of 20 trials. Vocal responses and correct response times were recorded to track development.

What they found

The researchers compared performance across conditions and found that error rates significantly differed between the same and opposite conditions only for 3 to 4-year olds and 5 to 6-year olds, but not for older groups. However, analysis of correct response times showed that kids in the 7 to 8-year old and 9 to 10-year old brackets still showed significant differences between conditions. No significant differences in error rates or response times were found between the first five trials and the last five trials, indicating that performance did not deteriorate over a session.

The limits

What it doesn't show

This study is limited by its cross-sectional design, which does not track individual developmental changes over time. Also, an additional 14 participants were tested but excluded, including 9 outliers, one who failed the pretest, and 3 excluded due to recording errors. Because the sample sizes per group were relatively small, replication with larger samples is needed to confirm the exact age where performance convergence occurs.

Key terms

Inhibitory control
The cognitive ability to suppress an automatic, dominant response in order to perform a less natural but correct action.
Stroop effect
A phenomenon where a delay in reaction time occurs because of mismatching cognitive stimuli, forcing the brain to resolve a conflict.
Working memory
The mental system responsible for temporarily holding and manipulating information needed to perform cognitive tasks.
Prepotent response
An automatic, highly learned, or natural behavioral reaction to a specific stimulus.
Cross-sectional design
A research method that compares different groups of participants of varying ages at a single point in time.
Interference
The slowdown in processing speed or increase in errors caused by competing mental processes.

Flashcards

1 / 22

Want these cards to stick?

Save the deck to NoteFren and study it with spaced repetition.

Save these cards to NoteFren— study “How does the ability to stop automatic habits develop in kids?” with spaced repetition

Quiz yourself

1 / 10

How does this study define inhibitory control?

Common questions

Why did the researchers use circles of different sizes instead of the traditional day-night pictures?

The traditional day-night task requires children to learn abstract associations, which taxes working memory. Big and small circles represent concrete physical properties that children learn early, allowing the task to isolate inhibitory control rather than memory capacity.

Why was it important that performance did not drop during the session?

In older day-night tasks, young kids often performed worse toward the end, suggesting they forgot the rules. Because performance remained steady here, it indicates that participants kept the rules in mind and the task successfully kept memory demands low.

Which age groups struggled the most with accuracy?

Only children in the 3 to 4-year old and 5 to 6-year old groups made significantly more mistakes in the opposite condition than in the same condition.

Did many children fail to complete the task?

Very few; only one child failed the pretest for the opposite condition, which is a major improvement over older versions of the task where many young participants failed.

More on Development