Skip to content
PaperFren

Carbon-coated nickel nanoparticles that make CO from CO2

Open paper intelligence

N-doped carbon plus a carbon coat lets metallic Ni nanoparticles reach about 94% CO faradaic efficiency, suppressing hydrogen evolution.

Source

Carbon-supported Ni nanoparticles for efficient CO<sub>2</sub> electroreduction

Jia M, Choi C, Choi C, et al. · Chemical science · 2018

doi.org/10.1039/c8sc03732aRead the full paper ↗61 citationscc by

Study at a glance

Design
Other — Pyrolyzed carbon-supported Ni nanoparticles for aqueous CO2-to-CO electrolysis with DFT
N
Electrocatalysis materials study — no sample N
Population
Ni nanoparticle catalysts on N-doped carbon supports
Outcome
CO faradaic efficiency and current density in CO2 electroreduction

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Inspect source passages

Carbon-coated nickel nanoparticles that make CO from CO2

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

CO faradaic efficiency reaches approximately 94% at −0.7 V vs RHE.

This metallic Ni catalyst affords a high CO FE of up to approximately 94% (at –0.7 V vs. RHE) and a current density of 22.7 mA cm –2 (at –1.1 V), making it superior to all previous metallic Ni catalysts and even comparable to the best single Ni atom catalysts reported to date.

Ni content is ~3.6 wt% in Ni-NC_ATPA@C and ~4.0 wt% in Ni-NC_TPA@C.

The content of Ni in the catalysts was determined by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES); it was ∼3.6 wt% in Ni-NC_ATPA@C and ∼4.0 wt% in Ni-NC_TPA@C.
Read passages in the original paper

What they did

Authors pyrolyzed Ni with organic linkers and carbon black, characterized Ni loading (~3.6–4.0 wt%), XPS (Ni0, no Ni–N single-atom peak), HAADF-STEM (10–100 nm particles), and measured aqueous CO2-to-CO electrolysis plus DFT.

What they found

CO FE up to ~94% at −0.7 V vs RHE and 22.7 mA cm−2 at −1.1 V. Carbon coating plus N-doped support suppress HER. XPS/STEM argue metallic nanoparticles, not Ni single atoms or nitride.

The limits

What it doesn't show

Long-term industrial MEA stacks and C2+ products are not claimed; performance is compared to prior Ni catalysts, not a full techno-economic plant.

Key terms

Faradaic efficiency (FE)
Fraction of current that produces CO rather than H2.
HER suppression
Carbon coat/N-support that make H2 evolution less competitive.
Ni0 nanoparticles
Metallic nickel particles 10–100 nm, not isolated Ni–N4 sites.
N-doped carbon
Support with pyridinic/pyrrolic/graphitic nitrogen.
CO2-to-CO
Two-electron electroreduction to carbon monoxide.

Flashcards

1 / 11

0 of 11 answers reviewed

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 6

Peak CO FE is about:

Common questions

Best CO FE?

About 94% at −0.7 V vs RHE.

Current density cited?

22.7 mA cm−2 at −1.1 V.

Single atoms?

No: STEM 10–100 nm particles; no Ni–N XPS peak.

Ni loading?

~3.6–4.0 wt%.

More on Electrochemistry