Does physical coldness make us more utilitarian?
Feeling physically cold makes people more likely to accept sacrificing a single individual to save many, driven by a reduction in empathy rather than increased logical thinking.
Source
Cold-hearted or cool-headed: physical coldness promotes utilitarian moral judgment
What they did
The researchers conducted two experiments to see how physical coldness affects moral choices. In Experiment 2, Forty-one Japanese college students wore a scarf containing either frozen packs or room-temperature packs while answering eight high-conflict and eight low-conflict moral dilemmas. The researchers then measured the participants' empathy for the victims, physical and social distance, emotional states, and response times.
What they found
Participants wearing the frozen scarf judged utilitarian sacrifices as significantly more acceptable in high-conflict scenarios. This physical coldness did not alter decision times or overall positive and negative moods, suggesting it did not trigger slow, logical reasoning. Instead, physical coldness marginally reduced empathic feelings, which partially explained the increase in utilitarian choices.
The limits
What it doesn't show
The study does not establish whether coldness alters empathy specifically toward the victim or toward everyone in the scenario, as it did not measure feelings toward those saved. Additionally, the small sample size of Forty-one students in Experiment 2 limits the generalizability of the findings. The self-reported measures of empathy may also fail to capture automatic, unconscious emotional responses to cold temperature.
Key terms
- Utilitarian moral judgment
- A moral decision-making approach focused on maximizing the overall good, such as sacrificing a single person to save many.
- Deontological moral judgment
- A moral decision-making approach based on strict rules or duties, such as the idea that harming an innocent person is always wrong.
- Embodied cognition
- The theory that our physical bodily sensations, like warmth or coldness, can directly influence our abstract psychological states and decisions.
- High-conflict personal moral dilemma
- A scenario where a person must make a difficult choice between two highly emotional and conflicting moral paths, such as actively causing harm to prevent a larger tragedy.
- Construal level
- The psychological distance at which people mentally represent ideas, where a high level focuses on abstract goals and a low level focuses on concrete details.
Flashcards
Want these cards to stick?
Save the deck to NoteFren and study it with spaced repetition.
Quiz yourself
What are the three ways to facilitate utilitarian moral judgment identified in past research?
Common questions
How did the researchers manipulate the participants' temperature?
In Experiment 2, participants wore a scarf around their necks that contained either frozen internal water packs (the cold condition) or room-temperature water packs.
Does being cold make people more logical?
No. The study found that physical coldness did not increase response times or activate abstract thinking. Instead of making people 'cool-headed' or logical, the coldness made them more 'cold-hearted' by dampening their empathy.
Did the cold temperature put the participants in a bad mood?
No, the researchers measured positive and negative emotional states and found that the cold scarf had no significant effect on the participants' overall moods.
More on Moral psychology