Skip to content
PaperFren

Does physical coldness make us more utilitarian?

Open paper intelligence

Feeling physically cold makes people more likely to accept sacrificing a single individual to save many, driven by a reduction in empathy rather than increased logical thinking.

Source

Cold-hearted or cool-headed: physical coldness promotes utilitarian moral judgment

Nakamura H, Ito Y, Honma Y, et al. · Frontiers in psychology · 2014

doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01086Read the full paper ↗5 citationscc by

Study at a glance

Design
Human experiment — Between-subjects cold vs room-temperature scarf while judging high- and low-conflict personal dilemmas
N
N=41 · Experiment 2 analytic n = 41 Japanese undergraduates; Experiment 1 was a separate coldness manipulation
Population
Japanese undergraduates
Outcome
Acceptability of utilitarian sacrifice in high-conflict dilemmas under physical coldness, with empathy as a mediator

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Inspect source passages

Does physical coldness make us more utilitarian?

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

two experiments conducted in the research

In two experiments, we exposed participants to extreme cold or typical room temperature and then asked them to make personal moral dilemma judgments.

Experiment 2 of the study

In Experiment 2, we examined whether coldness puts people in a “ cold-hearted ” state.
Read passages in the original paper

What they did

The researchers conducted two experiments to see how physical coldness affects moral choices. In Experiment 2, Forty-one Japanese college students wore a scarf containing either frozen packs or room-temperature packs while answering eight high-conflict and eight low-conflict moral dilemmas. The researchers then measured the participants' empathy for the victims, physical and social distance, emotional states, and response times.

What they found

Participants wearing the frozen scarf judged utilitarian sacrifices as significantly more acceptable in high-conflict scenarios. This physical coldness did not alter decision times or overall positive and negative moods, suggesting it did not trigger slow, logical reasoning. Instead, physical coldness marginally reduced empathic feelings, which partially explained the increase in utilitarian choices.

The limits

What it doesn't show

The study does not establish whether coldness alters empathy specifically toward the victim or toward everyone in the scenario, as it did not measure feelings toward those saved. Additionally, the small sample size of Forty-one students in Experiment 2 limits the generalizability of the findings. The self-reported measures of empathy may also fail to capture automatic, unconscious emotional responses to cold temperature.

Key terms

Utilitarian moral judgment
A moral decision-making approach focused on maximizing the overall good, such as sacrificing a single person to save many.
Deontological moral judgment
A moral decision-making approach based on strict rules or duties, such as the idea that harming an innocent person is always wrong.
Embodied cognition
The theory that our physical bodily sensations, like warmth or coldness, can directly influence our abstract psychological states and decisions.
High-conflict personal moral dilemma
A scenario where a person must make a difficult choice between two highly emotional and conflicting moral paths, such as actively causing harm to prevent a larger tragedy.
Construal level
The psychological distance at which people mentally represent ideas, where a high level focuses on abstract goals and a low level focuses on concrete details.

Flashcards

1 / 26

0 of 26 answers reviewed

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 10

What are the three ways to facilitate utilitarian moral judgment identified in past research?

Common questions

How did the researchers manipulate the participants' temperature?

In Experiment 2, participants wore a scarf around their necks that contained either frozen internal water packs (the cold condition) or room-temperature water packs.

Does being cold make people more logical?

No. The study found that physical coldness did not increase response times or activate abstract thinking. Instead of making people 'cool-headed' or logical, the coldness made them more 'cold-hearted' by dampening their empathy.

Did the cold temperature put the participants in a bad mood?

No, the researchers measured positive and negative emotional states and found that the cold scarf had no significant effect on the participants' overall moods.

More on Moral psychology