Skip to content
PaperFren

Which kinds of word knowledge help children understand what they read?

Open paper intelligence

Knowing more words, knowing them more deeply, and having strongly linked word meanings each separately helped fourth graders understand texts, with written vocabulary size mattering most.

Source

Differential lexical predictors of reading comprehension in fourth graders

Swart NM, Muijselaar MML, Steenbeek-Planting EG, et al. · Reading and writing · 2017

doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9686-0Read the full paper ↗10 citationscc by

Study at a glance

Design
Cross-sectional — One-time battery of 13 tests in 11 Dutch primary schools; hierarchical regression plus full-vs-reduced model comparisons
N
N=292 · 292 children tested at the start of fourth grade (147 boys, 145 girls); all in the regression
Population
Dutch fourth graders from 11 urban and suburban primary schools
Outcome
Composite reading-comprehension score from four tests (short passages, national Cito scale, PIRLS narrative and expository texts)

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

What they did

The researchers gave 292 Dutch fourth graders a battery of 13 tests: four reading-comprehension tests combined into one score, oral and written vocabulary-size tests, a word-definition test (depth), a word-association test (connection strength), plus decoding, short-term memory and nonverbal reasoning. They entered reasoning and memory first, then decoding, then the four vocabulary measures in a hierarchical regression, and dropped each vocabulary measure in turn to see how much unique variance it carried.

What they found

Reasoning, memory and decoding together explained a substantial share of comprehension, and the vocabulary measures added a further 30% on top, for 65% explained in total. Every vocabulary measure had a unique effect: written vocabulary breadth added 8%, depth 2%, connection strength 1%, and oral breadth only 0.4%. Much of the vocabulary contribution was shared among the four measures rather than unique to any one.

The limits

What it doesn't show

It is a single-time-point correlational study, so it cannot show that building vocabulary causes better comprehension; the authors call for intervention and longitudinal studies. No listening-comprehension measure was included, even though listening comprehension is a strong known predictor that likely overlaps with vocabulary. The written vocabulary test and the reading tests both require decoding, which may inflate their overlap, and the word-association measure had fairly low reliability (alpha .63). The sample is from one country and one grade.

Key terms

Vocabulary breadth
How many words a person knows, i.e. the number of entries in their mental lexicon.
Vocabulary depth
How well a person knows each word's meaning, measured here by asking children to define words.
Lexical Quality Hypothesis
The idea that comprehension depends on how complete and tightly linked a word's spelling, sound and meaning representations are.
Hierarchical regression
A regression where predictors are added in steps, so you can see how much extra variance each new block explains after the earlier ones.
Unique variance
The part of an outcome that one predictor explains after all the other predictors are already accounted for.

Flashcards

1 / 11

0 of 11 answers reviewed

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 6

What design did this study use?

Common questions

If vocabulary explains 30% of comprehension, does teaching vocabulary raise comprehension by that much?

No. The 30% is a statistical association in one snapshot; it does not tell you how much comprehension would change after an intervention. Only an experiment could show that.

Why was written vocabulary the strongest predictor?

The authors suggest it overlaps most with reading comprehension because both require decoding printed words as well as knowing meanings, so they share spelling, sound and meaning demands.

What should teachers take from this?

The authors argue vocabulary teaching should aim not just at more words but at deeper meanings and links between words, while noting that intervention studies are still needed to confirm it helps.

More on Reading