Skip to content
PaperFren

How the aging brain learns to see shapes in clutter

While older and younger adults improve equally at identifying visual shapes in noisy backgrounds, they rely on different brain pathways, with older adults relying more on attention networks in the parietal lobe rather than frontal decision-making areas.

Source

Dissociable circuits for visual shape learning in the young and aging human brain

Mayhew SD, Kourtzi Z · Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2013

doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00075Read the full paper ↗11 citationscc by

What they did

The researchers trained ten young adults and ten older adults to identify radial or concentric circular patterns hidden in visual noise. This training took place over three sessions on consecutive days. To see how brain activity changed with this training, the researchers used functional MRI to scan the participants' brains. They also ran a control experiment with eight participants in each age group to see if brain changes persisted when participants performed an unrelated task.

What they found

Both the young and older groups showed similar improvements in their behavioral ability to detect the shapes in clutter after training. However, the brain scans showed that these groups used different neural pathways. Young adults showed learning-related changes across an extended network of occipitotemporal, parietal, and frontal brain regions. In contrast, older adults showed learning-related changes that were concentrated almost entirely in parietal regions.

The limits

What it doesn't show

This study cannot prove that the parietal brain changes are the direct cause of the visual improvements in older adults, as fMRI measurements are correlational. The study was also limited by its small sample sizes of ten participants per group in the main experiment and eight participants per group in the control experiment. Because fMRI scans have poor temporal resolution, this design cannot separate fast sensory signals from slower cognitive processes. Additionally, the researchers had to adjust the response design for older adults to ensure motor speed differences did not confound the results.

Key terms

Glass patterns
Visual stimuli composed of pairs of dots aligned to create global structures like circles or radial patterns, often used to study how the brain integrates local details into a single shape.
Multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA)
A machine-learning technique used to decode mental states or stimulus features by analyzing the joint activity across multiple small brain areas rather than single locations.
fMR-metric function
A mathematical curve that relates a machine-learning classifier's accuracy in reading brain patterns to the physical strength of a visual stimulus.
Parietal cortex
A region of the brain involved in processing spatial awareness, sensory integration, and directing attention to salient features in the environment.
Psychometric function
A mathematical model that plots a participant's detection rate or discrimination accuracy against a physical property of the stimulus, such as signal strength.
Hemodynamic response
The rapid delivery of blood to active neuronal tissues, which fMRI measures as a proxy for neural activity.

Flashcards

1 / 35

Want these cards to stick?

Save the deck to NoteFren and study it with spaced repetition.

Save these cards to NoteFren— study “How the aging brain learns to see shapes in clutter” with spaced repetition

Quiz yourself

1 / 10

What is the main behavioral finding regarding visual form learning in young versus older adults?

Common questions

Why did older adults rely on different brain regions if their performance was identical to younger adults?

Older brains may recruit alternative neural pathways—specifically parietal attention networks—to compensate for age-related declines in frontal brain structures, allowing them to achieve the same behavioral improvements through attention-guided mechanisms rather than decision-focused networks.

How did the researchers ensure the participants were actually learning global shapes rather than just memorizing specific dot positions?

They changed the spacing between the dots (the Glass shift) between the training sessions and the scanner tests, and slightly rotated the shapes on every trial, forcing the brain to recognize the overall pattern rather than memorizing local visual features.

Does this mean older adults have lost the ability to use frontal brain regions for learning?

Not necessarily. Frontal regions show structural and functional changes during normal aging, but this study shows that the brain can dynamically adapt by shifting the cognitive burden to intact parietal attentional networks to successfully master new visual skills.

What is the difference between the main and control experiments?

In the main experiment, participants actively decided whether the shapes were concentric or radial while being scanned. In the control experiment, they ignored the shapes entirely and focused on finding target letters, showing that some learning-induced brain changes persist even when you are not paying attention to the learned task.

More on Neurocognitive aging