How should we infer consciousness in unresponsive patients?
Consciousness as subjective experience can only be inferred third-personally; a list of operational indicators is used to guide recognition in hard cases, including disorders of consciousness.
Source
Indicators and criteria of consciousness: ethical implications for the care of behaviourally unresponsive patients
What they did
Starting from a recently introduced indicator list (also aimed at non-human and other challenging cases), the authors spell ethical implications for DoC care when imaging or behaviour under-determines awareness.
What they found
Assessing others’ consciousness is inferential: we rely on subjective reports or proxies. Activity in (named) systems has been found in some behaviourally unresponsive patients. Indicators are not the same as a metaphysical definition of consciousness.
The limits
What it doesn't show
This is neuroethics of criteria, not a new fMRI series. It does not settle every DoC treatment duty.
Key terms
- Consciousness
- Subjective experience, identifiable from outside only by inference.
- Operational indicators
- A practical list that facilitates recognising consciousness in challenging cases.
- DoC
- Disorders of consciousness; behaviourally unresponsive patients with unknown awareness.
- Third-person inference
- We assess others’ experience via reports or proxies, never by direct inspection.
Flashcards
Research intelligence for this paper
See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.
Quiz yourself
Consciousness here is?
Common questions
Why inference?
Subjective experience is only available third-personally via an inferential process.
What do they start from?
A recently introduced list of operational indicators.
Clinical target?
Ethical implications for care of behaviourally unresponsive patients.
More on Consciousness