Skip to content
PaperFren

Can AI prediction dashboards help online groups?

Open paper intelligence

Combining AI performance prediction with learning analytics reshaped analysis of online graduate groups' collaboration in an engineering course.

Source

Integration of artificial intelligence performance prediction and learning analytics to improve student learning in online engineering course

Ouyang F, Wu M, Zheng L, et al. · International journal of educational technology in higher education · 2023

doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00372-4Read the full paper ↗19 citationscc by

Study at a glance

Design
Other — AI performance prediction and learning analytics applied to online graduate group work
N
N=62 · 62 graduate students in 15 groups over an 8-week course
Population
Online graduate engineering students in collaborative writing groups
Outcome
Collaboration patterns and reflections under AI-supported performance prediction

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Inspect source passages

Can AI prediction dashboards help online groups?

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

62 graduate students (43 master, 19 doctoral)

Participants were 62 graduate students (43 master students and 19 doctoral students), majoring in ocean engineering at Ocean College from the university.

15 groups of four to five students

The students were assigned into 15 groups (four to five students per group), mixed with master and doctoral students in each group.
Read passages in the original paper

What they did

In an eight-week online graduate course, sixty-two students worked in fifteen groups on weekly collaborative writing. Researchers gathered discussion logs, applied AI-supported performance prediction and analytics, and analysed social-network measures plus students' end-of-course reflections.

What they found

Most social-network metrics differed significantly across analytic comparisons, including density. The integrated approach is framed as a way to identify at-risk students and support instructional decision-making during online collaborative work.

The limits

What it doesn't show

Findings come from one graduate engineering course rather than a multi-institution randomised trial. Predictive analytics are decision aids, not guarantees of later achievement for every learner.

Key terms

AI performance prediction
Models that estimate learners' likely performance to flag risk and guide support.
Learning analytics
Collecting and analysing learner data to understand and improve learning processes.
Social network analysis (SNA)
Methods that quantify relationships and interaction structure within groups.
Collaborative writing
Joint text production where groups plan, draft, and revise together.
At-risk students
Learners identified as likely to struggle without timely instructional support.

Flashcards

1 / 12

0 of 12 answers reviewed

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 7

How many graduate students participated?

Common questions

How many students participated?

62 graduate students (43 master's and 19 doctoral).

How were they organised?

Into 15 mixed groups of four to five.

How long was the course?

Eight weeks online in summer 2022.

What process data were analysed?

Among other sources, 105 group discussion files across seven weeks.

More on Online learning