Skip to content
PaperFren

Can heat let light pull particles toward its source?

Open paper intelligence

Light heating one side of a silicon particle creates an electric field in the surrounding soap solution that pulls the particle backward toward the light.

Source

Opto-thermoelectric pulling of light-absorbing particles

Lin L, Kollipara PS, Kotnala A, et al. · Light, science & applications · 2020

doi.org/10.1038/s41377-020-0271-6Read the full paper ↗29 citationscc by

Study at a glance

Design
Other — Amorphous silicon particles in CTAC solution heated by 532 nm light through a low-NA objective or optical fibre; particle tracking gives trap stiffness and pulling velocity versus CTAC concentration, size and intensity, backed by thermal and force simulations.
N
Individual tracked particles of 500 nm to 1.2 micrometre; for fibre pulling, velocities of many particles were pooled; counts not reported.
Population
Amorphous silicon micro- and nanoparticles in aqueous surfactant
Outcome
Trapping force and stiffness, 3D transport range, and pulling velocity toward the light source

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

What they did

The authors illuminated amorphous silicon particles, which absorb light and conduct heat poorly, in water containing the charged surfactant CTAC. The heated front of the particle sets up a temperature gradient that separates surfactant micelles and chloride ions, producing a thermoelectric field pointing toward the light. They modelled forces, measured trapping stiffness from particle jiggling at different surfactant concentrations and sizes, moved particles in 3D with a low-numerical-aperture lens, used silicon particles as shuttles to carry non-absorbing beads, and pulled particles toward a laser-coupled fibre over long distances.

What they found

Simulation predicted a maximum in-plane trapping force of about 1 pN at 1 mM CTAC, and experiments likewise showed the tightest traps at 1 to 2 mM and loose ones at 0.2 and 4 mM. Unlike ordinary optical tweezers, smaller particles were trapped more stiffly, because larger ones spread heat and have weaker surface gradients. A particle was lifted about 126 μm from the floor to the top of the chamber, and particles more than 1 mm from a fibre tip were pulled toward it, reaching about 9 μm/s at the highest intensity; without CTAC no pulling occurred.

The limits

What it doesn't show

Particle counts and run-to-run statistics are not reported, and pulling velocities varied widely between particles. Force values come from modelling that uses estimated surface charges rather than direct force measurement. The effect depends on a specific surfactant and on particles that absorb light, so it only moves other objects indirectly via shuttles, and at high power particles were pushed instead of pulled.

Key terms

Optical tractor beam
Any scheme where light pulls an object back toward its source, against the usual push of radiation pressure.
Thermoelectric field
An electric field that appears when cations and anions drift different amounts along a temperature gradient.
Soret coefficient
A measure of how strongly a species migrates in a temperature gradient.
Trapping stiffness
How strongly a trap resists displacement, estimated from the spread of a trapped particle's Brownian positions.
Zeta potential
The effective electrical potential at a particle's surface in solution, reflecting its charge.

Flashcards

1 / 10

0 of 10 answers reviewed

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 5

What mainly pulls the silicon particle toward the light?

Common questions

How can light pull something when photons push?

The pull does not come from photon momentum; light heats the particle, and the resulting thermoelectric field in the solution drags the positively charged particle toward the hot, illuminated side.

Why does trapping get weaker above 1 mM CTAC?

Surface adsorption saturates and extra surfactant raises the ionic strength, collapsing the electrical double layer and lowering the particle's zeta potential.

How do the authors rule out ordinary optical forces?

They use low numerical aperture and low power so gradient forces are negligible, and pulling vanishes when CTAC is removed.

More on Optical trapping and manipulation