Do we tailor our moral choices to the impression we want to make?
Students preparing to interview for a caring job gave more rule-based moral answers, while those preparing for a management job gave more outcome-based answers, apparently to match what they thought the recruiter wanted.
Source
The Effects of Social Perception on Moral Judgment
Study at a glance
- Design
- Human experiment — Four studies: two person-perception studies (inferring traits from moral choices and vice versa), then two between-subjects experiments where students prepared for a fictional job interview for a 'warm' role (mental-health receptionist) or a 'competent' role (restaurant manager) before judging moral dilemmas.
- N
- No single N. Study 2: 45 students; pretest: 45 students; Study 3: 71 students; Study 4: 64 students. The Study 1 method section is missing from the available text, so its sample size is not stated.
- Population
- Chinese university students
- Outcome
- Ratings of how appropriate the utilitarian action is in Trolley, Footbridge and Lifeboat dilemmas; trait ratings of warmth and competence; perceived recruiter expectations (Study 4)
Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.
What they did
First, Chinese students judged people described as making rule-based (deontological) or outcome-based (utilitarian) choices, and predicted the choices of imagined warm or competent people. Then, in two experiments, students were randomly assigned to prepare for a fictional job interview as either a mental-health-centre receptionist (a warm role) or a restaurant manager (a competent role), with pay supposedly depending on performance. They then rated classic sacrificial dilemmas such as the Footbridge case, and in the final study also said what answer they thought the recruiter wanted.
What they found
People who make deontological judgments were seen as warmer and more moral, and those making utilitarian judgments as more competent; imagined competent people were predicted to favour utilitarian choices (a large effect, Cohen's d of 1.54). Students applying for the manager role rated the utilitarian option as more acceptable than those applying for the receptionist role, in Study 3 (d = 0.64) and again in Study 4 (d = 0.98). In Study 4, the role effect ran partly through what participants believed the recruiter expected.
The limits
What it doesn't show
Samples were small, all Chinese university students, and some were gender-unbalanced, so generality is unclear. Participants answered hypothetical dilemmas under an imaginary interview, so the results show strategic self-presentation of stated judgments, not what people would actually do or privately believe. The mediation in Study 4 is correlational and based on a single-dilemma measure. The available text also lacks the Study 1 method and sample size, so that study cannot be fully evaluated.
Key terms
- Deontological judgment
- Judging an action by whether it follows moral rules or duties, for example refusing to push someone to their death even to save several others.
- Utilitarian (consequentialist) judgment
- Judging an action by its outcomes, favouring whatever produces the greatest good for the most people.
- Warmth and competence
- The two basic dimensions of social perception: whether someone seems friendly and well-intentioned, and whether they seem capable.
- Self-presentation
- Adjusting what one says or does to create a desired impression in others.
- Mediation
- A statistical test of whether an effect of one variable on another passes through a third variable.
Flashcards
0 of 10 answers reviewed
Research intelligence for this paper
See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.
Quiz yourself
Which role led students to give more utilitarian dilemma judgments?
Common questions
Does this show people's moral values change with the job they want?
It shows their stated judgments on hypothetical dilemmas shift; whether their underlying values or real behaviour change was not tested.
Why would a utilitarian answer seem competent?
Utilitarian choices are associated with deliberate, outcome-focused reasoning, which people link with capability and effectiveness in roles like management.
What does the Footbridge dilemma involve?
Deciding whether to push one person off a bridge to stop a trolley that would otherwise kill several others; the utilitarian answer is to push, the deontological answer is to refuse.
More on Moral psychology