Did US premature-death inequities only widen as health improved?
US premature mortality inequities shrank in the late 1960s–1970s then widened or stagnated—showing disparities do not automatically move with average health.
Source
The fall and rise of US inequities in premature mortality: 1960-2002
What they did
Researchers tracked premature mortality and infant death across US county income quintiles and racial/ethnic groups from 1960 to 2002, comparing absolute and relative inequities over time.
What they found
Inequities fell especially between 1966 and 1980 (notably for populations of color), then relative gaps widened and absolute gaps stagnated. Relative premature-mortality ratios of about 1.3 in 1970/1980 rose later.
The limits
What it doesn't show
County income is an ecological SES proxy; the study does not identify a single causal policy that produced the fall-then-rise pattern.
Key terms
- Premature mortality
- Deaths occurring earlier than an expected age cutoff, used as a preventable-death marker.
- Health inequities
- Unjust differences in health across social groups.
- Absolute vs relative disparity
- Rate difference versus rate ratio between groups.
- County income quintile
- Counties grouped by median household income into five strata.
- Infant death
- Mortality in the first year of life, a classic equity indicator.
Flashcards
Want these cards to stick?
Save the deck to NoteFren and study it with spaced repetition.
Quiz yourself
The paper’s core narrative of inequities is:
Common questions
What period is covered?
Roughly 1960–2002.
Did inequities only grow?
No—they fell then later widened/stagnated.
Who saw large mid-period gains?
Especially US populations of color during 1966–1980.
Teaching point?
Average health gains do not dictate one inevitable disparity trajectory.
More on Health equity