Skip to content
PaperFren

Do research rules restore trust?

Open paper intelligence

Kerasidou argues that consent and ethics-committee rules make research more reliable, but restoring trust also requires trustworthiness and goodwill toward the vulnerable.

Source

Trust me, I'm a researcher!: The role of trust in biomedical research

Kerasidou A · Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2017

doi.org/10.1007/s11019-016-9721-6Read the full paper ↗66 citationscc by

What they did

The paper reviews the trust-restoration story after research scandals, O’Neill’s scepticism that ‘loss of trust’ matches behaviour, and Baier-style analyses that separate trust from reliance. It then applies that distinction to biomedical research governance.

What they found

Trust is a decisive factor in participation. Reliance predicts behaviour; trust assumes goodwill toward vulnerability. Regulation can even signal untrustworthiness. If institutions want trust back, they need ethics education, dedicated teams, and stakeholder engagement, not only compliance systems.

The limits

What it doesn't show

This is conceptual, not a new survey of participants. O’Neill’s behavioural argument is cited, not retested. It does not specify a metric for trustworthiness.

Key terms

Trust
A stance that assumes the other’s goodwill toward one’s vulnerability, not mere prediction of behaviour.
Reliance
Depending on someone because you can predict what they will do.
Trustworthiness
Traits of the trustee that make trust apt, including goodwill.
Reliability
Rule-governed predictability; IRBs can raise this without making research trustworthy.

Flashcards

1 / 10

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 6

IRBs mainly raise?

Common questions

Did IRBs solve the trust problem?

They raised reliability; the paper says they had little effect on trustworthiness and can even hurt trust.

What does O’Neill doubt?

That reports of lost trust match how people actually behave, given research volume has risen.

What should institutions add?

Ethical conduct, ethics teams, and engagement that shows the social value of research.

More on Research ethics