Skip to content
PaperFren

Can COVID patients be watched safely at home virtually?

Open paper intelligence

An Australian virtual hospital enrolled most local outpatient COVID-19 cases with frequent video contact and saw few escalations and no deaths in the study window.

Source

Virtual Health Care for Community Management of Patients With COVID-19 in Australia: Observational Cohort Study

Hutchings OR, Dearing C, Jagers D, et al. · Journal of medical Internet research · 2021

doi.org/10.2196/21064Read the full paper ↗82 citationscc by

Study at a glance

Design
Other — Service evaluation of SLHD virtual care contacts (video and phone) during COVID-19
N
1,902 video and 688 telephone consultations; unique-patient N not a single analytic sample
Population
Community patients managed by Sydney Local Health District virtual care
Outcome
Mix and volume of video versus telephone virtual-care contacts

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Inspect source passages

Can COVID patients be watched safely at home virtually?

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

162/173 (93.6%) local positives enrolled; no deaths

Of them, 162 (93.6%) were enrolled in the rpavirtual program, and the remaining individuals were admitted to hospital or referred to another health service.

Video consultations were 66.3% of contacts

Video consultations (n=1902, 66.3%) comprised the majority of patient contact, and telephonic consultations (n=688, 24.0%) accounted for the remainder of patient contact.
Read passages in the original paper

What they did

Sydney Local Health District’s rpavirtual program enrolled community COVID-19 patients, contacting them multiple times daily (mostly video), delivering home monitoring kits, and escalating to ambulance/ED when needed.

What they found

Of 173 positive clinic cases, 162 (93.6%) joined virtual care. Median stay was 8 days with a median of 16 contacts; 66% of contacts were video. Five ambulance callouts and three hospital admissions occurred; no deaths were recorded.

The limits

What it doesn't show

Excluding high-risk patients and observing a short early-pandemic window means results do not prove safety for severe COVID or later variants without selection.

Key terms

Virtual health care
Hospital-equivalent remote clinical management using video/phone and home monitoring.
Remote monitoring
Patient-recorded observations reviewed by clinicians outside the hospital ward.
Clinical escalation
Worsening that triggers ambulance, ED, or admission.
Workaround
Staff substituting phone for video to keep schedules when technology fails.
Hospital-at-home
Delivering inpatient-intensity monitoring/treatment in the community.

Flashcards

1 / 11

0 of 11 answers reviewed

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 6

rpavirtual enrolled about what share of local outpatient positives?

Common questions

Who was excluded?

Higher-risk patients needing hospital admission or other services; the program targeted community-manageable cases.

How often were patients contacted?

Model aimed at multiple daily contacts, with median 16 contacts per admission.

Was video required?

Video was preferred, but phone was used when video failed.

Were children or pregnant patients included?

Yes—small numbers of pediatric and pregnant patients were enrolled.

More on Telemedicine