Skip to content
PaperFren

Executive function

Do preschool motor skills travel with executive function?

Han X, Zhao M, Kong Z, et al. · Frontiers in psychology · 2022

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

In 394 four-year-olds, TGMD-2 motor scores correlated with NIH Toolbox executive function (r = 0.33); locomotor skills predicted inhibition, working memory, and flexibility, while object control predicted only inhibition.

Study at a glance

Design
Cross-sectional — Preschool FMS (TGMD-2) and EF (NIH Toolbox) with OLS regressions controlling age, sex, BMI, and setting
N
N=394 · 394 healthy preschoolers; 182 girls (46.2%) and 212 boys (53.8%); mean age 4.07 ± 0.76 years
Population
Preschool children assessed in kindergarten settings (Beijing-area authoring team)
Outcome
Total and subscale FMS (locomotor, object control) and EF (inhibition, working memory, cognitive flexibility)

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Key findings

Total FMS moderately related to total EF (r = 0.33, p < 0.001) and predicted EF (β = 0.37). Locomotor skills predicted inhibition (β = 0.21), working memory (β = 0.18), and cognitive flexibility (β = 0.24); object control predicted only inhibition (β = 0.17).

Methodology

Tested 394 kindergarten children (4.07 ± 0.76 years; 212 boys) with TGMD-2 (FMS) and the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (EF). Used correlations and OLS models controlling age, sex, BMI, and setting.

Limitations

A cross-sectional kindergarten sample cannot prove that motor training raises EF, only that the two domains co-occur after covariate control.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.