Functional connectivity
Can BOLD go up when the brain uses less oxygen?
Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC
In 40 healthy adults, about 40% of voxels with significant BOLD changes—especially in default-mode network—showed oxygen metabolism moving the opposite way.
Study at a glance
- Design
- Human experiment — BOLD plus quantitative fMRI (CBF/CBV/OEF/CMRO2) during calculation, memory, control, and rest tasks in healthy adults
- N
- N=40 · 47 enrolled; 40 analysed (22 women, 18 men; mean age 32.1±9.2); CBV subset n=10; control study n=18
- Population
- Healthy right-handed adults performing cognitive tasks in the scanner
- Outcome
- Whether BOLD signal direction matches oxygen-metabolism (CMRO2) changes across cortex, especially default-mode network
Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.
Key findings
~40% of significant BOLD voxels were discordant, often in DMN. Discordant voxels had different baseline OEF and used OEF changes to meet oxygen demand; concordant voxels relied mainly on CBF. Authors argue quantitative fMRI better tracks neuronal activity.
Methodology
Collected BOLD and quantitative fMRI while people did calculation, autobiographical memory, control, and rest tasks, then classified voxels as concordant or discordant for ΔBOLD vs ΔCMRO2.
Limitations
Healthy-adult task fMRI does not rewrite every clinical BOLD study; it shows canonical neurovascular coupling is not uniform across cortex.
How this study connects
Role on claims
Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.
Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.
Related papers in this topic
Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.