Self-regulation
Does the ability to wait for rewards change across the lifespan?
Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC
Middle-aged adults discounted future money the least, children and the oldest adults the most, and at every age people who were more future-oriented were better at waiting for bigger rewards.
Study at a glance
- Design
- Cross-sectional — Five age groups tested once on a board-game delay-of-gratification test, the Kirby delay-discounting questionnaire, an imagination (episodic future thinking) task and a time-perspective scale; group comparisons, quadratic regressions and rank correlations
- N
- N=96 · 96 participants split across five age groups (9-14, 18-25, 35-55, 65-80, 80+), so each group is small; some analyses have 92-95 cases
- Population
- Children, adolescents and adults aged 9 to 101 from the Zurich and Lucerne regions of Switzerland, screened for cognitive impairment and depression
- Outcome
- Delay of gratification (DoG-A composite), delay discounting rate k, episodic future thinking 'experience index', and future/past time perspective (Balanced Time Perspective Scale)
Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.
Key findings
Delay discounting differed by age and followed a U-shape, lowest (most patient) in young and middle-aged adults and highest in children and the oldest adults; only the middle-aged versus 80+ comparison was significant after correction. The behavioural delay-of-gratification score showed only a non-significant trend with age. Both waiting measures were related to each other and to future time perspective, but not to past time perspective or to how vividly people imagined future events. Future orientation declined with age while past orientation rose, and 'futurists' (high future, low past orientation) were the best at delaying gratification.
Methodology
The researchers tested 96 people aged 9 to 101 in five age groups. Delay of gratification was measured with a board game in which players repeatedly chose between a small reward now and a bigger one later, using snacks, hypothetical money, real money and magazines. Delay discounting was measured with a 27-item questionnaire of hypothetical money choices. Participants also imagined and described future and non-time-specific scenes (episodic future thinking) and filled in a scale measuring how much they think positively about the future and the past.
Limitations
With 96 people spread over five age groups, each group was small, so the study had limited power to detect age differences in the behavioural waiting task. Because it compares different people of different ages at one time, age differences could reflect generation, education or income (which rose with age in this sample) rather than ageing itself. The youngest children were 9 or older, so the study says nothing about the preschool years where most delay-of-gratification research is done. The quadratic and linear age models did not differ significantly in fit, and most variables were non-normal, forcing non-parametric tests.
How this study connects
Role on claims
Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.
Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.
Related papers in this topic
Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.