Skip to content
PaperFren

Epigenetics

Is ethnic DNA methylation just ancestry?

Galanter JM, Gignoux CR, Oh SS, et al. · eLife · 2017

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

In 573 GALA II Latinos, shared ancestry explained a median 75.7% of ethnicity-linked methylation variance, but environmental signals (e.g., maternal smoking loci) still contributed.

Study at a glance

Design
Cross-sectional — EWAS of ethnicity vs DNA methylation in GALA II Latino participants with genetic ancestry estimates
N
N=573 · 573 participants with methylation data; 524 with genomic ancestry estimates (Puerto Rican n=220, Mexican n=276)
Population
Latino American GALA II participants (mostly Puerto Rican or Mexican origin) with dense genotyping and methylation arrays
Outcome
Ethnicity-associated CpG methylation, fraction explained by shared ancestry, and enrichment for environmentally associated loci

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Key findings

Ethnicity and ancestry associated with 916 and 194 CpGs. Ancestry accounted for a median 75.7% (IQR 45.8–92%) of ethnicity-associated methylation variance. After ancestry adjustment, 314/834 ethnicity sites remained. Ethnicity-associated sites were enriched for prior environmental associations, especially maternal smoking in pregnancy.

Methodology

Measured DNA methylation and genetic ancestry in GALA II Latino participants, mapped ethnicity-associated CpGs, estimated how much shared genomic ancestry explained those differences, and tested enrichment of environmentally associated sites.

Limitations

Cross-sectional methylation cannot prove which exposures caused residual ethnic differences; GALA II Latinos may not generalize to all populations.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.