Skip to content
PaperFren

Development

How does aging affect our ability to sense our own body?

Murphy J, Geary H, Millgate E, et al. · Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2018

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

As adults age, both their subjective awareness of internal bodily signals and their objective accuracy in detecting their own heartbeat decline.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

  • SupportsInteroceptionconcept

    Objective interoceptive accuracy and subjective bodily awareness both systematically decline as healthy adults age.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

Study at a glance

Design
Cross-sectional — Online BPQ (Study 1) plus lab heartbeat-tracking accuracy with age mediation (Study 2)
N
Study 1: 345 healthy adults from a 1,008-person survey; Study 2: 136 after 4 exclusions
Population
Healthy adults spanning a wide age range
Outcome
Self-reported interoceptive awareness and heartbeat-tracking accuracy as a function of age

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Inspect source passages

How does aging affect our ability to sense our own body?

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

18% of the effect

The indirect effect of BMI accounted for 0.18 (18%) of the total effect between age and interoception ( ab/c ; see Jose, ), indicating partial mediation.

How is interoception defined in the introduction of this paper?

Interoception is described as the perception of the physical condition of the body (Craig, ), including numerous visceral sensations such as hunger, itch, respiratory and cardiac awareness (Khalsa & Lapidus, ).
Read passages in the original paper

Key findings

Subjective body awareness significantly decreased with age (r = -.337). Objective heartbeat tracking accuracy also declined across the adult lifespan (r = -.21), a relationship that was partially mediated by an age-related increase in body mass index, which accounted for 18% of the effect. Even after accounting for bodily and psychological variables, age still exerted a direct negative effect on interoceptive accuracy.

Methodology

In the initial study, 345 healthy adults aged 18 to 89 completed an online questionnaire measuring their subjective awareness of bodily sensations. In the subsequent study, 136 participants aged 20 to 90 completed a physical heartbeat tracking task to measure objective accuracy, alongside a time-counting control task. The researchers also collected physiological measures like BMI, blood pressure, resting heart rate, heart rate variability, and participants' general beliefs about average heart rates.

Limitations

This study relies on correlational data, meaning it cannot prove that aging directly causes the decline in interoceptive abilities. These studies examined subjective awareness and objective accuracy in separate participant groups, so it remains unclear how these different dimensions relate within the same individuals over time. Additionally, the objective tests relied on a single modality, cardiac tracking, which may not represent how aging affects other sensory modalities like hunger, breathing, or pain.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.