Skip to content
PaperFren

Metacognition

Does our ability to judge our own performance decline as we age?

Palmer EC, David AS, Fleming SM · Consciousness and cognition · 2014

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

While older adults can perform visual tasks just as accurately as younger adults, their ability to judge the accuracy of their own decisions decreases over time.

Study at a glance

Design
Cross-sectional — Visual perception metacognition across adulthood; staircase held accuracy ~70%
N
N=60 · Ages 18–84; memory metacognition subset n=38; trail-making subset n=44
Population
Adults spanning young to older age
Outcome
Age effects on visual vs memory metacognitive efficiency

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Key findings

The researchers found that visual metacognitive efficiency significantly declined with age, meaning older participants were less aware of when they made visual errors. In contrast, memory-based metacognitive efficiency did not show a statistically significant relationship with age. Additionally, the age-related decline in visual self-awareness remained significant even when controlling for executive functioning scores.

Methodology

The study evaluated how aging affects self-awareness of decision accuracy in 60 participants aged 18 to 84. Participants performed a visual perception task where they identified which of several brief intervals contained a target Gabor patch, with a staircase adjustment keeping visual accuracy near 70%. A subset of 38 participants also completed a word recognition memory task, and 44 completed a trail-making test to evaluate executive functioning.

Limitations

Because this was a cross-sectional study, it cannot prove that aging directly causes a decline in metacognitive efficiency over time within the same individuals. Additionally, some older participants had to state their confidence ratings verbally rather than using a keyboard, which introduces a potential confound in how responses were collected. Finally, the study failed to find a statistically significant difference between age's correlation with visual awareness versus memory awareness, meaning it does not prove the decline is entirely domain-specific.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

  • SupportsMetacognitionconcept

    There is disagreement regarding whether aging causes a decline in trial-by-trial metacognitive efficiency; one study found a significant age-related decline in visual self-awareness, while another study using performance-matched adaptive tasks found that local metacognitive efficiency remained completely intact across age groups.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • Memory-based metacognitive efficiency appears to remain relatively stable and does not show a statistically significant decline across the adult lifespan.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • Age-related declines in visual metacognitive self-awareness can remain statistically significant even when controlling for executive functioning scores.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • Studies disagree on whether visual metacognitive efficiency declines with age: one study found a significant age-related decline in judging visual decisions, while another found that trial-by-trial local metacognitive efficiency remains intact across age groups.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

Open questions

Tensions this paper is part of

From concept pages' “where studies disagree.” Disagreement means the same question; scope means different assays, populations, or outcomes.

  • Scope difference — different assays, populations, or outcomes

    There is disagreement regarding whether aging causes a decline in trial-by-trial metacognitive efficiency; one study found a significant age-related decline in visual self-awareness, while another study using performance-matched adaptive tasks found that local metacognitive efficiency remained completely intact across age groups.

    Also on this tension

  • Scope difference — different assays, populations, or outcomes

    Studies disagree on whether visual metacognitive efficiency declines with age: one study found a significant age-related decline in judging visual decisions, while another found that trial-by-trial local metacognitive efficiency remains intact across age groups.

    Also on this tension

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.