Skip to content
PaperFren

Motivation

Does believing you can get smarter improve maths grades?

Dong L, Jia X, Fei Y · Frontiers in psychology · 2023

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

Students' belief that intelligence can grow did not directly predict their later maths scores, but it was linked to scores indirectly through enjoying maths, owning their failures, feeling capable and feeling less anxious.

Study at a glance

Design
Cohort — Questionnaires on mindset and motivational variables at the end of year 7, then maths test scores tracked over years 8-9; structural equation modelling with bootstrapped mediation
N
N=266 · 266 students who took part in every round of data collection (only completers were analysed)
Population
Junior middle school students (aged 12-13 in year 7) at one urban school in Hengshui, Hebei Province, China
Outcome
Average of three official mathematics tests (end of year 8, middle and end of year 9); mediators were intrinsic motivation, perceived self-responsibility for failure, maths self-efficacy and maths anxiety

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Key findings

Growth mindset was not significantly correlated with maths achievement and had no direct path to it in the model. Instead, mindset predicted stronger intrinsic motivation (β = 0.356) and a stronger tendency to take personal responsibility for failure (β = 0.379). Taking responsibility was linked to higher self-efficacy and lower anxiety, and these in turn predicted achievement (self-efficacy β = 0.348, anxiety β = −0.152, motivation β = 0.199). All three indirect pathways were statistically significant.

Methodology

The researchers surveyed 266 Chinese students at the end of their first year of junior middle school about their mindset (whether intelligence can change), their enjoyment of maths, how they explained doing badly on maths tests, their confidence with maths tasks and their maths anxiety. They then collected the students' scores on three official maths exams over the next two years. Structural equation modelling tested whether mindset predicted exam scores directly or through the other variables.

Limitations

Mindset and all the proposed mediators were measured at the same moment in year 7, so the study cannot show that mindset came first and changed motivation or anxiety; the causal ordering in the model is assumed, not tested. The text does not describe controlling for students' earlier maths attainment, which could drive both confidence and later grades. All students came from one school in one Chinese city and only students who completed every round were analysed, so the authors caution the results may not generalize to other cultures. Mindset was not manipulated, so this correlational design says nothing directly about whether mindset interventions would work.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.