Functional connectivity
Can brain wiring predict who benefits from TMS under stress?
Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC
Frontal magnetic stimulation did not lower the stress-hormone response on average, but women whose left prefrontal cortex was more strongly anti-coupled with the caudal anterior cingulate at rest showed a smaller cortisol rise after real stimulation.
Study at a glance
- Design
- Human experiment — Randomised, sham-controlled within-subject crossover: resting-state fMRI at baseline, then on two days a Trier Social Stress Test followed by active or sham intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) to the left DLPFC, at least a week apart.
- N
- N=34 · Four of the recruited women were excluded for incomplete scans or missing cortisol data, leaving 34 for the connectivity and cortisol analyses; 33 for the mood analyses.
- Population
- Healthy right-handed young women aged 18 to 27 using hormonal contraceptives, recruited at Ghent University
- Outcome
- Salivary cortisol after stress (area under the curve relative to increase and to ground) as a function of stimulation type and baseline DLPFC-to-ACC resting-state connectivity; mood ratings
Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.
Key findings
The stress test raised cortisol on both days, but active stimulation did not change the cortisol response compared with sham. However, connectivity between the left DLPFC and the left caudal ACC interacted with stimulation: the more negative (anticorrelated) this baseline connection, the smaller the cortisol increase after active, but not sham, stimulation (a moderate positive correlation with active stimulation and none with sham). Connectivity with the subgenual ACC, a well-known predictor of TMS response in depressed patients, did not predict the effect.
Methodology
Healthy young women first had a resting-state fMRI scan to measure how the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), the usual TMS target in depression, was connected to five subregions of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). On two later days they underwent the Trier Social Stress Test (a mock job speech and mental arithmetic in front of a hidden jury) and then received two sessions of either real or sham intermittent theta burst stimulation over their individually located left DLPFC. Saliva cortisol was sampled repeatedly after the stressor.
Limitations
Only healthy young women on hormonal contraceptives were tested, so the results cannot be generalised to men or to people with depression. The key result is an individual-difference correlation within one sample of 34 and needs replication; ten connectivity measures were tested, although a Bonferroni correction was applied. Stimulation came right after the stressor, so effects on the stress peak and on recovery cannot be separated, and the 5-minute gap between sessions is shorter than in most protocols. There was no separate measure of subjective stress beyond mood scales.
How this study connects
Role on claims
Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.
Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.
Related papers in this topic
Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.