Resource allocation
Is regionalising care fair to disabled people?
Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC
Regionalisation promises to integrate health and social services, which matters especially for people with disabilities and chronic illness in the community; the authors test that promise with a disability-ethics justice framework.
Key findings
Without effective integration, community living fails. Regionalisation’s promise is especially important for this group. Justice here tracks marginalization in health and quality of care, not only efficiency.
Methodology
They consider regionalisation from disability ethics (disability studies plus normative/bioethics), stress service integration for community living, and use a justice framework on marginalization and health/quality of life.
Limitations
This is a 2006 Canadian-style justice argument, not a new RCT of a region. It does not measure wait times.
How this study connects
Role on claims
Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.
Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.
Related papers in this topic
Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.