Darwin & evolution
Was Darwin's selection a cause or an effect?
Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC
Bradley claims Origin does not make natural selection a mindless causal mechanism; it is a higher-order effect of struggle and development.
How this study connects
Role on claims
Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.
One reading claims Origin does not make natural selection a mindless causal mechanism but a higher-order effect of struggle and development.
Evidence for the claim as stated.
Inspect source passages
Was Darwin's selection a cause or an effect?
These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.
The synthesis of Darwinism and Mendelian genetics is dated here to the 1930s and 1940s.
synthesis of Darwinism and Mendelian genetics in the 1930s and 1940s, Darwinians have not regarded the struggle for existence as a cause of natural selection
Mendel before MS?
nature does not make jumps’ (e.g. Bateson, ; cf. Darwin, , pp. 171ff: ‘natura non facit saltum’). As soon as the ‘modern synthesis’ (MS; Huxley, ) gained i
Key findings
After the modern synthesis, Darwin was narrowed to selection-as-mechanism. Developmental/active Darwinisms read selection as effect. Darwin used Newton’s unexplained gravity and the undulatory theory of light as analogues: a grouping law need not state an observed cause. Struggle for existence, on this reading, is among the real causes; selection names their outcome.
Methodology
The essay re-reads Darwin’s vera causa language, Origin’s argument structure, replies to Huxley, the 1860 Newton/Brewster gravity parallel and the wave theory of light, and historiographic MS-consistent readings, then sets them beside evo-devo, DST, and West-Eberhard’s plasticity.
Limitations
This is intellectual history, not a new phylogeny. It does not experimentally separate cause from effect in wild populations.
Related papers in this topic
Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.