Diagnostic accuracy
Do doctors think AI will take their jobs?
Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC
Among 669 Korean physicians/students, AI familiarity was low (5.9%) but 83.4% saw medical usefulness—especially for diagnosis—while only 35.4% thought AI could replace them.
Study at a glance
- Design
- Cross-sectional — Online mobile survey of Korean physicians/medical students (11 items)
- N
- N=669 · 669 completed responses
- Population
- Korean doctors and medical students surveyed online
- Outcome
- Awareness of and attitudes toward medical AI usefulness, risks, and replacement
Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.
Key findings
High perceived usefulness (83.4%) and diagnosis as top use case; concerns about unexpected situations (29.3%); minority endorsed diagnostic superiority (43.9%) or job replacement (35.4%).
Methodology
They fielded an 11-item Google Forms survey on AI recognition, attitudes, likely medical uses, and perceived risks.
Limitations
Attitudes are not performance benchmarks; a convenience online sample may not represent all clinicians.
How this study connects
Role on claims
Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.
Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.
Related papers in this topic
Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.