Face processing
Do surgical masks make it harder to tell if two faces match?
Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC
Putting a surgical mask on one or both faces made people much worse at judging whether two photos showed the same person, for famous and unfamiliar faces alike.
Study at a glance
- Design
- Human experiment — Online between-subjects experiment: participants randomly assigned to no-mask, one-face-masked or both-faces-masked conditions completed two simultaneous face-matching tasks; a deep neural network did the same tasks.
- N
- N=138 · 201 UK adults recruited via Prolific; 138 remained after pre-registered exclusions (53 control, 43 mixed, 42 masked).
- Population
- UK adult online participants
- Outcome
- Face-matching sensitivity (d') and response bias (c) on the Glasgow Face Matching Test and a new famous/unfamiliar face matching task
Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.
Key findings
Masks lowered matching sensitivity with large effects (d between 1.02 and 1.21 versus no masks), and it did not matter whether one or both faces were masked. The drop was about as large for familiar as for unfamiliar faces, though masked familiar faces were still matched better than unmasked unfamiliar ones. Masks made people biased toward saying 'different' for unfamiliar faces and 'same' for familiar faces. The neural network stayed near ceiling except for familiar-task match pairs where only one face was masked.
Methodology
138 UK adults judged whether pairs of photos showed the same person or two different people. They were randomly assigned to see no masks, a mask on one face in each pair, or masks on both faces, with masks digitally added to the same photos. Everyone did a standard unfamiliar-face test and a new task mixing celebrities and unknown models, followed by a recognition test to check which celebrities they actually knew. A face-recognition deep neural network was tested on the same pairs.
Limitations
The masks were photo-edited onto images, so real worn masks might preserve some face-shape information. The design was between-subjects, so it cannot show how the same person's performance changes with masks or identify individual differences. The study documents the impairment but does not test why it happens, for example missing features versus disrupted holistic processing. Results for the network may not generalise, as two of three commercial systems in the supplement were impaired.
How this study connects
Role on claims
Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.
Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.
Related papers in this topic
Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.