Skip to content
PaperFren

Epidemics

Do epidemic films teach us about distrust?

Han Q, Curtis DR · Medical humanities · 2020

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

Against a top-down Foucault-style story that elites always use epidemics as tools of control, the paper reads cinema as evidence that afflicted communities often distrust official action — and that films themselves shape trust.

Study at a glance

Design
Qualitative / archival — Film survey plus historical epidemic literature on community distrust of official control
N
Cinema/cultural analysis across epidemic films; not a sample N
Population
Cinematic depictions of epidemic distrust from contagion to asylum-oppression films
Outcome
Afflicted communities’ distrust of official action and films’ role in shaping trust

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Key findings

Communities in outbreaks are not always convinced of prescribed action. Authorities have used outbreaks as tools for oppressive regulations. Films also influence people’s trust.

Methodology

It cites 19th-century India (Arnold) on epidemic regulations, then surveys films from contagion to bioterrorism and even Cuckoo’s Nest as asylum-oppression cinema, arguing films influence trust because they supply information about disease.

Limitations

This is film-and-epidemic cultural history, not epidemiology. Cuckoo’s Nest is analogical (asylum), not a plague movie.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

  • SupportsEpidemicsconcept

    Epidemic cinema is read against a top-down Foucault-style story that elites always use epidemics as tools of control: afflicted communities often distrust official action.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

Open questions

Tensions this paper is part of

From concept pages' “where studies disagree.” Disagreement means the same question; scope means different assays, populations, or outcomes.

  • Scope difference — different assays, populations, or outcomes

    SupportsEpidemics

    Epidemic cinema is read against a top-down Foucault-style story that elites always use epidemics as tools of control: afflicted communities often distrust official action.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.