Rheumatology
Do forums and game features make a health website work better?
Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC
For people with rheumatoid arthritis, adding online social support or game-like rewards to an information website increased use and empowerment and was linked to better self-reported health behaviour, while information alone did no better than no website.
Study at a glance
- Design
- RCT — Single-blinded parallel RCT with four website arms (information only, plus social support, plus gamification, or all features) and a no-website control; outcomes at baseline, 2 and 4 months analysed with multilevel growth models.
- N
- N=155 · 155 randomised patients who completed the baseline questionnaire, analysed by intention to treat (information 30, social support 29, gaming 28, social support plus gaming 28, control 40).
- Population
- Adults with doctor-diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis in Ticino, the Italian-speaking part of Switzerland, with internet access and no other major chronic illness
- Outcome
- Primary: self-reported physical activity, health care utilisation and prescription medication overuse; secondary: empowerment and RA knowledge; side outcome: website visits
Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.
Key findings
Patients offered the gamified version visited the site far more often (a mean of 66.81 versus 26.15 visits). Compared with controls, the full-feature group increased exercise time over the study, and both the social support group and the full-feature group reduced their health care visits; medication overuse fell only marginally in the social support group. Empowerment rose more in the social support group and the gaming group than in controls, while knowledge about the disease did not change in any group, and the information-only group never differed from controls.
Methodology
The researchers randomly assigned 155 Swiss patients with rheumatoid arthritis to four versions of a self-management website or a control group: a website with information only, information plus social support (patient videos, a forum and chats with doctors), information plus gamification (points, badges, a leaderboard and prizes), all features, or no website at all. Patients completed questionnaires at the start, after 2 months and after 4 months. Multilevel growth-curve models compared how each group's outcomes changed over time relative to the no-website control group, adjusting for demographics.
Limitations
All health outcomes were self-reported, including physical activity, which studies using activity monitors have sometimes failed to confirm. Each arm had only about 30 patients, many group-by-time effects were tested with P values near 0.05 and no correction for multiple comparisons, so some findings may be chance. The control group completed paper questionnaires and was told a different study purpose, follow-up lasted only 4 months, and the sample came from one Swiss canton of long-diagnosed patients, which limits generalisation.
How this study connects
Role on claims
Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.
Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.
Related papers in this topic
Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.
- Are people with autoimmune diseases more prone to blood clots?
- RIPK1 inhibitor GSK2982772 did not beat placebo on RA activity here
- Early RA synovium splits into two expression/histology groups
- Seliciclib MTD is 400 mg in TNF-refractory RA (TRAFIC phase 1b)
- Can gastrodin calm RA by blocking histone lactylation?