Skip to content
PaperFren

Emotion

How do CRC couples share burden and distress?

Chen X, Wang Z, Zhou J, et al. · Frontiers in psychology · 2023

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

In 200 patient–spouse dyads, self-perceived and caregiver burden linked both partners’ anxiety/depression and mediated paths from dyadic coping.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.

Inspect source passages

How do CRC couples share burden and distress?

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

200 colorectal cancer patient–spousal caregiver dyads surveyed.

Methods This study surveyed 200 colorectal cancer patient-spousal caregiver dyads from August 2022 to December 2022.

Survey window?

from August 2022 to December 2022.
Read passages in the original paper

Key findings

Burdens associated with both partners’ anxiety/depression. Patients’ dyadic coping linked to both burdens; caregivers’ dyadic coping linked mainly to patients’ coping and depression. Self-perceived burden showed actor–partner mediation; caregiver burden showed partner-only mediation between coping and anxiety/depression.

Methodology

Surveyed 200 colorectal cancer patient–spousal caregiver dyads on self-perceived burden (patients), caregiver burden (spouses), dyadic coping, anxiety, and depression; analyzed with Pearson correlations and actor–partner interdependence mediation models.

Limitations

Cross-sectional dyadic data cannot prove causal direction; findings are from one Chinese hospital window and may not generalize to non-spousal caregivers.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.