Skip to content
PaperFren

Cardiovascular

How much dementia could prevention still avert?

de Bruijn RF, Bos MJ, Portegies ML, et al. · BMC medicine · 2015

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

In Rotterdam cohorts, about one quarter to one third of dementia cases were potentially attributable to modifiable risks—and that share did not shrink over two decades.

Study at a glance

Design
Cohort — Rotterdam Study; population attributable risks for modifiable risks across earlier and later cohorts
N
N=7003 · 7,003 in original-cohort analyses; extended cohort analysed separately (n=2,953)
Population
Rotterdam Study participants without prevalent dementia
Outcome
Population attributable fraction of dementia from modifiable cardiovascular risks and education

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Key findings

Potential prevention remained roughly one quarter to one third of cases and had not declined between cohorts spanning about two decades, motivating public-health action.

Methodology

Using prospective Rotterdam Study data, investigators estimated population attributable risks for modifiable cardiovascular risks, related diseases, and education for dementia, comparing earlier and later cohorts.

Limitations

PAR estimates assume risk-factor causality and eliminability; they are not a trial proving a specific prevention package.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

  • SupportsCardiovascular Careconcept

    Multiple studies in this library examine cardiovascular care with empirical patient or population outcomes rather than opinion alone.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • SupportsCardiovascular Careconcept

    Potential prevention remained roughly one quarter to one third of cases and had not declined between cohorts spanning about two decades, motivating public-health action.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • SupportsCardiovascular Careconcept

    Effect sizes and settings differ across cardiovascular care studies — digital vs clinic, trial vs observational — so results should not be pooled casually.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • SupportsCohort Studymethod

    Rotterdam Study analyses estimated that modifiable cardiovascular risks, related diseases and education could still account for roughly one quarter to one third of dementia cases, a potential-prevention fraction that had not declined between cohorts spanning about two decades. Those PAR estimates assume risk-factor causality and eliminability; they are not a trial of a named prevention package.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

Open questions

Tensions this paper is part of

From concept pages' “where studies disagree.” Disagreement means the same question; scope means different assays, populations, or outcomes.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.