Perceptual decision
Does zapping visual cortex at the right moment slow decisions?
Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC
Briefly disrupting the lateral occipital cortex 400 ms after a hard-to-see image appeared slowed people's face-or-car decisions, just as a prior brain-network model predicted.
Study at a glance
- Design
- Human experiment — Within-subject chronometric paired-pulse TMS to left and right lateral occipital cortex at five timings during a difficult face/car discrimination, with a 500 ms timing as the control.
- N
- N=13 · 13 healthy adults completed both TMS sessions (15 recruited, 2 dropped out).
- Population
- Healthy young adults screened for psychiatric and neurological history, at Duke University
- Outcome
- Reaction time and accuracy for face versus car decisions at each TMS timing
Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.
Key findings
As predicted, TMS starting at 400 ms slowed reaction times compared with the 500 ms control (Cohen's d = 0.84), with no difference between hemispheres or between faces and cars. Unexpectedly, TMS 200 ms before the image sped responses (d = 1.33), and TMS at 200 ms reduced accuracy for cars only. The 500 ms control did not differ from no-TMS trials, supporting its use as a baseline.
Methodology
Thirteen healthy adults judged whether noisy, briefly flashed images showed a face or a car, with image clarity adjusted for each person so they were right about 79% of the time. Across two sessions (one for each hemisphere), pairs of TMS pulses 50 ms apart were delivered over lateral occipital cortex at one of five times relative to the image (200 ms before, or 200, 400, 450 or 500 ms after), plus trials without TMS. Stimulation at 500 ms, after the model says decision processing is finished, served as the control.
Limitations
With only 13 participants the findings need replication. Targets were based on group fMRI coordinates rather than each person's own activation, and there was no sham or control brain site, so the speed-up before the image may reflect a non-specific effect of the click and tap of TMS (intersensory facilitation) rather than real enhancement. The study tests one prediction of the model; it does not show that lateral occipital cortex is itself the accumulator of evidence rather than feeding another region.
How this study connects
Role on claims
Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.
Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.
Related papers in this topic
Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.