Research method
Single-cell QC (mitochondrial filtering)
3 studies
Single-cell QC decides which barcodes/nuclei enter analysis—classic filters (including high mitochondrial content) remove damaged cells but can also discard biologically real stressed or metabolically altered states.
Pipelines look objective. Filtering choices change who is in the atlas—especially for disease or perturbation studies—and foundation models inherit those choices.
Studies
3
Findings
3
3 supporting · 0 challenging · 2 qualifying citations
Open tensions
1
Currently
What we know
- High-mito filters can deplete viable metabolically altered malignant cells.
- Foundation cell models for post-perturbation prediction need careful benchmarks.
- Disease atlases depend on QC’d nuclei before cell-state claims.
Largest unresolved question
A mito-filter methods result, a foundation-model benchmark, and a disease atlas answer different layers of the single-cell stack.
Common misconceptions
High mitochondrial reads always mean the cell is dead junk.
Some viable, metabolically altered states also score high and can be discarded by blunt filters.
Related
Claim ledger
What the evidence shows
Drawn from 3 studies in this library. Mix labels say which citation roles are present; they are not a strength score. Supports means evidence for a finding; Challenges means evidence against a stated position; Qualifies marks scope.
High-mito filters can deplete viable metabolically altered malignant cells.
Filtering cells with high mitochondrial content is shown to remove not only debris but also viable metabolically altered malignant cells—QC as biology, not just cleanup.
Foundation cell models for post-perturbation prediction need careful benchmarks.
Benchmarking foundation cell models for post-perturbation RNA-seq prediction tests how well learned representations generalize after QC and perturbation—downstream of filtering choices.
- High-mito filters can discard living cancer cell states— model benchmark ≠ mito-filter depletion experiment
Study Role Design N Population Outcome Simple baselines beat cell foundation models on Perturb-seq Supports Computational / modellingBenchmark of scGPT and scFoundation against train-mean and classical ML on public Perturb-seq splits Adamson 68,603 cells, Norman 91,205 cells, plus Replogle subsets; 16,239 genes Public CRISPR perturbation scRNA-seq datasets (CRISPRi/a screens) Train-mean and feature-based classical ML outperform scGPT/scFoundation on post-perturbation expression prediction under current benchmarks High-mito filters can discard living cancer cell states Qualifiesmodel benchmark ≠ mito-filter depletion experiment Computational / modellingReanalysis of public cancer scRNA-seq and spatial datasets comparing pctMT filters, viability proxies, metabolism, and clinical correlates N=134 · Nine public scRNA-seq datasets: 441,445 cells from 134 patients (160,225 malignant) Malignant and tumour-microenvironment cells across multiple human cancer types Standard >15% pctMT filters deplete viable, metabolically altered malignant HighMT cells linked to xenobiotic metabolism, drug resistance, and clinical features Disease atlases depend on QC’d nuclei before cell-state claims.
ICM snRNA-seq profiles ~100k QC’d cardiac nuclei before composition claims—reminding students that atlas biology sits atop filtering decisions.
- High-mito filters can discard living cancer cell states— heart atlas composition ≠ mito-filter methods paper
Study Role Design N Population Outcome What cell programs mark ischemic cardiomyopathy? Supports Case-controlsnRNA-seq of non-infarct LV from ICM transplant recipients vs NF controls N=15 · 7 ICM + 8 NF; 99,684 nuclei after QC Human LV nuclei from ICM and non-failing hearts Cell-composition and transcriptional differences in ICM vs NF High-mito filters can discard living cancer cell states Qualifiesheart atlas composition ≠ mito-filter methods paper Computational / modellingReanalysis of public cancer scRNA-seq and spatial datasets comparing pctMT filters, viability proxies, metabolism, and clinical correlates N=134 · Nine public scRNA-seq datasets: 441,445 cells from 134 patients (160,225 malignant) Malignant and tumour-microenvironment cells across multiple human cancer types Standard >15% pctMT filters deplete viable, metabolically altered malignant HighMT cells linked to xenobiotic metabolism, drug resistance, and clinical features
Debates
Tensions and limits
Some items are genuine disagreements on the same question. Others mark different assays, populations, or outcomes.
A mito-filter methods result, a foundation-model benchmark, and a disease atlas answer different layers of the single-cell stack.
A mito-filter methods result, a foundation-model benchmark, and a disease atlas answer different layers of the single-cell stack.
- High-mito filters can discard living cancer cell states
- Simple baselines beat cell foundation models on Perturb-seq
- What cell programs mark ischemic cardiomyopathy?
Study Role Design N Population Outcome High-mito filters can discard living cancer cell states Supports Computational / modellingReanalysis of public cancer scRNA-seq and spatial datasets comparing pctMT filters, viability proxies, metabolism, and clinical correlates N=134 · Nine public scRNA-seq datasets: 441,445 cells from 134 patients (160,225 malignant) Malignant and tumour-microenvironment cells across multiple human cancer types Effect of high-mito filtering on viable cell recovery Simple baselines beat cell foundation models on Perturb-seq Supports Computational / modellingBenchmark of scGPT and scFoundation against train-mean and classical ML on public Perturb-seq splits Adamson 68,603 cells, Norman 91,205 cells, plus Replogle subsets; 16,239 genes Public CRISPR perturbation scRNA-seq datasets (CRISPRi/a screens) Foundation model post-perturbation prediction benchmarks What cell programs mark ischemic cardiomyopathy? Supports Case-controlsnRNA-seq of non-infarct LV from ICM transplant recipients vs NF controls N=15 · 7 ICM + 8 NF; 99,684 nuclei after QC Human LV nuclei from ICM and non-failing hearts ICM vs NF cardiac snRNA-seq atlas
PaperFren reads this as a limit on how far one study travels — different assays, populations, or outcomes — not a forced fight between papers.
Timeline
How understanding moved
Study years are when the paper was published. Evidence edits are dated changes to this page's claims. Explanations are when PaperFren added a Discovery — not a claim that the science happened that day.
2026
Concept page published
Single-cell QC (mitochondrial filtering)
Concept page published
Single-cell QC (mitochondrial filtering)
Change log
What changed
Dated edits to this page's evidence: studies added or removed from a claim, claims added or withdrawn, and new explanations tagged here. Coverage edits are distinct from reviewed research changes and corrections. Dates record PaperFren updates; study publication dates appear in the timeline.
- Coverage updated · Concept page published
- Coverage updated · Concept page published
Papers
3 studies in this library bear on Single-cell QC (mitochondrial filtering), ordered by citations.
- What cell programs mark ischemic cardiomyopathy?
snRNA-seq of ~100k cardiac nuclei showed fewer cardiomyocytes and more specialized endothelial states in ICM, overlapping other end-stage cardiomyopathy programs.
- High-mito filters can discard living cancer cell states
Across ~441k cells from 134 patients, malignant cells often exceed 15% mitochondrial RNA without stress-death signatures and show metabolic programs relevant to therapy.
- Simple baselines beat cell foundation models on Perturb-seq
Benchmarking scGPT and scFoundation against baselines finds that training-set mean and basic ML with biological features outperform the foundation models on post-perturbation expression prediction.
Compare studies
Select 2–10 studies. Design and N are labels, not a ranking.
Nothing selected yet.
Questions
What is still open
A mito-filter methods result, a foundation-model benchmark, and a disease atlas answer different layers of the single-cell stack.
Ask PaperFren about Single-cell QC (mitochondrial filtering)
Study this conceptflashcards and short-answer questions
What risk does a blunt high-mito filter carry beyond removing debris?
It can deplete viable metabolically altered cells that matter biologically.