Do blood ageing markers predict death better as a bundle than one-by-one?
In 777 Newcastle 85+ participants, a 40-biomarker frailty index predicted 7-year mortality (HR 1.05 per 1% FI-B; AUC 0.66) better than any single marker (AUC ≤0.61); combining with the clinical FI raised AUC to 0.75.
Source
Age-related frailty and its association with biological markers of ageing
Study at a glance
- Design
- Cohort — Newcastle 85+ cohort: baseline biomarker/clinical frailty indices vs up to 7-year mortality.
- N
- N=845 · 845 enrolled (mean age 85.5); FI-B calculable in 777 (60.9% women).
- Population
- Very old adults in the Newcastle 85+ Study (UK), mean age 85.5 years.
- Outcome
- All-cause mortality predicted by a 40-item biomarker frailty index (FI-B) vs clinical FI-CD, Fried phenotype, and single biomarkers.
Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.
What they did
Built FI-B from 40 cellular-ageing, inflammation, haematology, and immunosenescence markers, compared it with a clinical deficit FI and the Fried phenotype, and tested 7-year mortality with Cox models, Kaplan–Meier strata, random biomarker subsamples, and ROC AUCs.
What they found
Mean FI-B 0.35 vs FI-CD 0.22; nobody had FI-B <0.12. Each 1% FI-B rise raised HR by 5.4%. FI-B beat every individual biomarker and was robust to dropping items. Combined FI-CD/FI-B AUC was 0.75 vs 0.71 and 0.66 alone.
The limits
What it doesn't show
Moderate AUCs are not bedside tests; FI-B and FI-CD correlated only weakly (r=0.16), so blood markers do not simply duplicate clinical frailty.
Key terms
- FI-B
- Biomarker frailty index: proportion of 40 laboratory ageing deficits present (mean 0.35).
- FI-CD
- Clinical-deficits frailty index (mean 0.22) based on health problems, not labs.
- Fried phenotype
- Classic five-item physical frailty phenotype used as a comparator.
- Newcastle 85+ Study
- UK cohort of people around age 85; n=845 here with up to 7-year mortality.
- Deficit accumulation
- Frailty as the ratio of deficits present to deficits counted—applied here to blood markers.
Flashcards
Research intelligence for this paper
See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.
Quiz yourself
Newcastle 85+ n in the methods was:
Common questions
How old were participants?
Mean 85.5 years; FI-B n=777, 60.9% women.
Mean FI-B vs FI-CD?
0.35 vs 0.22; no one had FI-B <0.12.
Mortality HR per 1% FI-B?
About 1.05 (5.4% higher hazard).
Best discrimination?
Combined FI-CD + FI-B AUC 0.75 for 7-year death.
More on Diagnostic accuracy