Skip to content
PaperFren

Do doctors think AI will take their jobs?

Open paper intelligence

Among 669 Korean physicians/students, AI familiarity was low (5.9%) but 83.4% saw medical usefulness—especially for diagnosis—while only 35.4% thought AI could replace them.

Source

Physician Confidence in Artificial Intelligence: An Online Mobile Survey

Oh S, Kim JH, Choi SW, et al. · Journal of medical Internet research · 2019

doi.org/10.2196/12422Read the full paper ↗214 citationscc by

Study at a glance

Design
Cross-sectional — Online mobile survey of Korean physicians/medical students (11 items)
N
N=669 · 669 completed responses
Population
Korean doctors and medical students surveyed online
Outcome
Awareness of and attitudes toward medical AI usefulness, risks, and replacement

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

What they did

They fielded an 11-item Google Forms survey on AI recognition, attitudes, likely medical uses, and perceived risks.

What they found

High perceived usefulness (83.4%) and diagnosis as top use case; concerns about unexpected situations (29.3%); minority endorsed diagnostic superiority (43.9%) or job replacement (35.4%).

The limits

What it doesn't show

Attitudes are not performance benchmarks; a convenience online sample may not represent all clinicians.

Key terms

Artificial intelligence (AI)
Computer systems performing tasks that typically require human intelligence.
Familiarity
Self-reported good understanding of AI (only 5.9% here).
Diagnostic superiority
Belief AI diagnoses better than human doctors.
Job replacement
Belief AI could replace the respondent’s clinical role.
Unexpected situations
Edge cases where AI may lack adequate information.
Online survey
Web/mobile questionnaire used for rapid attitude sampling.

Flashcards

1 / 8

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 5

Completers:

Common questions

Sample size?

669 completers.

Good AI familiarity?

5.9% (40 people).

Useful in medicine?

83.4% agreed.

Replace physicians?

Only 35.4% agreed; majority disagreed.

More on Diagnostic accuracy