Skip to content
PaperFren

Safe wild-seed harvest depends on generation time

Open paper intelligence

Across 280 species, annuals can spare only about 2% of seeds each year, while long-lived plants can lose far more without collapsing.

Source

Assessing limits of sustainable seed harvest in wild plant populations

Bucharova A, Bossdorf O, Scheepens JF, et al. · Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025

doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70075Read the full paper ↗2 citationscc by

Study at a glance

Design
Computational / modelling — 30-year seed-harvest simulations with COMPADRE matrix population models
N
N=280 · 280 angiosperm species; 108 species used in some trait-predictor subsets
Population
Wild plant species with published matrix models
Outcome
Safe annual seed-harvest fractions average ~2% for annuals and rise with generation time; a 20% rule would drive annuals extinct

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Inspect source passages

Safe wild-seed harvest depends on generation time

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

280 plant species from 5 continents

Here, using data from wild populations of 280 plant species from 5 continents, we found that the current seed harvesting guidelines were often ineffective.

US guidelines allow 20% annual harvest

For example, annual harvesting of 20% of the annual seed production, as currently recommended in the United States (Plant Conservation Alliance, ), would have a small effect on palms, trees, or some herbaceous perennials, but it would drive all annual plants to extinction within only a few decades.
Read passages in the original paper

What they did

Authors simulated 30 years of seed harvest with COMPADRE matrix models for 280 angiosperms, tested US/Australian/German safe-seed rules, and predicted a generation-time-based harvest fraction.

What they found

US 20% annual harvest would drive annuals extinct in decades but barely affect trees. Safe annual fractions averaged 2.3% for annuals/biennials, 10.1% at 5-year generation time, and 40.1% at 20 years. Harvesting annuals only every 10 years raised the safe fraction to 30.3%. Generation time explained over half of vulnerability.

The limits

What it doesn't show

Models assume harvest from the same population every season for 30 years, which is uncommon. COMPADRE matrices are uneven globally, and real combine-harvest also removes biomass, not only seeds.

Key terms

Safe seed fraction
The maximum share of a wild population’s annual seed crop that can be taken without unacceptable decline.
Generation time
Mean age of reproductive individuals; the best predictor of harvest vulnerability here.
COMPADRE
A global database of plant matrix population models.
Matrix population model
A stage-structured model of survival and fecundity used to project population size.
Iteroparity
Reproducing more than once; here a weaker predictor than generation time.

Flashcards

1 / 10

0 of 10 answers reviewed

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 6

The best predictor of seed-harvest vulnerability was:

Common questions

Why is a single 20% rule dangerous?

It extinguishes annuals while being overly strict for palms and trees.

Can managers take more seed if they harvest less often?

Yes. For annuals, a 10-year interval raised the safe fraction from 2.3% to 30.3%.

Do seed banks help?

Permanent soil seed banks buffered harvest; clonality added little once generation time was accounted for.

Will wild harvest meet restoration demand?

Authors argue large-scale seed orchards are still needed.

More on Habitat restoration