Skip to content
PaperFren

How was river-blindness success built?

Open paper intelligence

Winters argues that OCP triumph narratives were actively assembled from metrics, statues, staged photos, and Bank publicity, even while transmission really did fall in indicator villages.

Source

Constructing Success: The World Bank, Onchocerciasis Control, and What Lies Beneath Triumphalist Global Health Narratives

Winters J · Social history of medicine : the journal of the Society for the Social History of Medicine · 2025

doi.org/10.1093/shm/hkae064Read the full paper ↗1 citationscc by

Study at a glance

Design
Qualitative / archival — Archival, oral-history, and grey-literature study of OCP success narratives
N
Programme history across eleven countries (1972–2002); not a single sample N
Population
World Bank/WHO Onchocerciasis Control Programme publicity and indicator-village evidence
Outcome
How metrics, images, and publicity assembled triumphalist narratives alongside real transmission declines

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

What they did

Archival reconstruction, oral history, and grey literature unpack the 25-million-hectare claim, McNamara’s financing role, ivermectin donations, and Reader’s Digest-style success hunting.

What they found

OCP ran in eleven countries (1972–2002). Land-freed figures were broad guesses. A famous blind-man-and-boy image may have been staged before the programme. Constructed success is not the same as zero impact.

The limits

What it doesn't show

This is a history of success-making, not a denial that onchocerciasis burden fell. It does not re-estimate DALYs from scratch.

Key terms

OCP
Onchocerciasis Control Programme in West Africa, 1972–2002, WHO-executed and Bank-financed.
Impact-based success
Judging programmes by scalable, cost-effective metrics that vertical campaigns display well.
25 million hectares
Widely cited land-freed figure based on contested generalizations, not a reproducible survey.
APOC
African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control (1995–2015), the OCP’s follow-on in success memory.

Flashcards

1 / 12

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 7

OCP years were?

Common questions

Was OCP ‘fake’?

No: indicator-village data showed falling transmission; the argument is about how success was narrated.

Why the Bank?

McNamara put the Bank in the financing hot seat despite onchocerciasis not being an obvious first health bet.

Why statues?

Bronze memorials at WHO, the Bank, Merck, and the Carter Center lock in a partnership-success memory.

More on International health