Skip to content
PaperFren

What do students rank as most important online?

Open paper intelligence

Students prioritize a hierarchy of online-course quality factors spanning basic modality, teaching presence, and richer interaction.

Source

Integrating students' perspectives about online learning: a hierarchy of factors

Van Wart M, Ni A, Medina P, et al. · International journal of educational technology in higher education · 2020

doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00229-8Read the full paper ↗12 citationscc by

Study at a glance

Design
Cross-sectional — Large survey with EFA of student-rated online course quality factors
N
N=987 · 987 respondents (~40% of ~2,500 contacted); 397-student pilot
Population
University students rating online-course quality priorities
Outcome
Hierarchy of online-learning quality factors (modality, teaching presence, interaction)

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Inspect source passages

What do students rank as most important online?

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

Pilot sample of 397 students

The instrument was pilot studied during academic year 2017–18 with a 397 student sample, facilitating an exploratory factor analysis leading to important preliminary findings

Approximately 2500 students contacted

Approximately 2500 students were contacted, with some instructors providing class time to complete the anonymous survey.
Read passages in the original paper

What they did

After piloting an instrument, instructors distributed a Qualtrics survey to roughly twenty-five hundred students; nearly a thousand responded. Exploratory factor analysis organised student priorities into a hierarchy of online-learning quality factors grounded in presence and modality literature.

What they found

Students treated some baseline online conditions as near-threshold requirements while weighting teaching presence and interactive features as higher-order quality drivers. Factor means showed clear differentiation among clusters of importance rather than a flat list of preferences.

The limits

What it doesn't show

Self-report importance ratings are not measured learning gains. The sample skews young and comes from courses whose instructors opted into distribution, so priorities may differ elsewhere.

Key terms

Teaching presence
The instructor's design, facilitation, and direction that guides cognitive and social processes online.
Social presence
Learners' sense of being real people who can relate to others in the online environment.
Cognitive presence
The extent to which learners can construct and confirm meaning through sustained reflection and discourse.
Basic online modality
Foundational online course features students expect before higher-order interaction matters.
Hierarchy of factors
An ordered set of quality drivers in which some elements act as prerequisites for others.

Flashcards

1 / 12

0 of 12 answers reviewed

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 7

How many students responded to the main survey?

Common questions

How many students responded?

Nine hundred eighty-seven, about a 40% response rate.

Was the survey instrument piloted?

Yes—with a 397-student pilot facilitating exploratory factor analysis.

Does the study measure grades?

No—it focuses on students' importance ratings of quality factors.

Who was surveyed?

Mostly young students, with 78% under age 30.

More on Online learning