Skip to content
PaperFren

Ultrashort PFAS dominate Dutch drinking water

Open paper intelligence

Across 18 Dutch plants, TFA and other C2–C3 PFAS dominate raw and finished water (often 49–99% of 56-PFAS mass); conventional carbon treatments often fail them, unlike longer-chain PFAS.

Source

Occurrence, Fate, and Related Health Risks of PFAS in Raw and Produced Drinking Water

Sadia M, Nollen I, Helmus R, et al. · Environmental science & technology · 2023

doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06015Read the full paper ↗111 citationscc by

What they did

Authors grabbed triplicate raw and finished samples at 18 full-scale plants (surface and groundwater), quantified 56 PFAS including ultrashort acids and branched isomers, and compared sums to EFSA/DWD/RPF risk metrics and treatment type.

What they found

Sum of 56 PFAS was 50–1150 ng/L in raw surface water and 90–530 ng/L in groundwater. Ultrashort PFAS (mainly TFA 30–1100 ng/L) were 49–99% of mass and barely differed after treatment. PAC/GAC sometimes showed negative ultrashort ‘removal’ (breakthrough/desorption).

The limits

What it doesn't show

Anonymous plants and one March–April 2021 campaign cannot rank every Dutch source year-round; TFA toxicology for drinking water is still unsettled relative to PFOA/PFOS guidelines.

Key terms

PFAS
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances: highly persistent fluorinated organics.
TFA
Trifluoroacetic acid, an ultrashort C2 PFAS that dominated samples here.
EFSA TWI
4.4 ng/kg-week for the sum of PFOA, PFNA, PFHxS, and PFOS.
Negative removal
Finished water higher than raw for some ultrashort PFAS, suggesting breakthrough or precursor breakdown.
Reverse osmosis
Size-exclusion treatment more likely than carbon sorption to control polar ultrashort PFAS.

Flashcards

1 / 11

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 7

Mass-dominant PFAS in these Dutch waters:

Common questions

What dominated the 56-PFAS sum?

Ultrashort C2–C3 acids, mainly TFA.

Did treatment remove TFA well?

Generally no—raw vs finished ultrashort levels were similar; some carbon plants went negative.

How many plants?

18 full-scale Dutch production locations.

Surface vs groundwater sums?

Surface raw 50–1150 ng/L; groundwater 90–530 ng/L for 56 PFAS.

More on Persistent pollutants